What’s Hot and Cooking In Scholarly Publishing
Across different creative sectors, existing studies point to measurable and, in some cases, already quantified economic and commercial harm. At the same time, a market for AI licensing is already...
An interview with Barbara McGillivray about the Journal of Open Humanities Data, which “features peer reviewed publications describing humanities data or techniques with high potential for reuse.”
As scholarly publishing becomes increasingly interconnected, are we paying enough attention to its operational sustainability?
Libraries and publishers can claim agency in the AI age by once again investigating and deeply understanding how our users work.
The Diamond OA community has built a declaration machine that runs in parallel with the under-resourced publishing machine it claims to serve, and the gap between them grows wider with every new communiqué.
Did you miss us at Charleston this week? Never fear, here are some highlights from our TSK panel discussion with three of our esteemed guest bloggers.
What might be lost if we automate a task without first fully understanding the expertise behind it?
How can a publisher make AI useful across the organization while keeping control of confidential information, editorial decisions, and accountability?
How can publishers move past the regulatory overview for accessibility compliance and into the production reality after sitting on decades of archived content, posts, and data.
The absence of AI doesn’t guarantee trustworthy research. And neither does disclosing AI use.
Today’s guest blogger argues that if we want scholarly publishing to be worth anything in a generation, we must acknowledge the risks we run by relying on intelligent automation.
Today we hear from some of SSP’s Advocacy Committee members about what changes they’d like to see to US federal support for research.
With the midterms approaching, read about this timely report on US government censorship of research on public health — the first to analyze the aggregated impact
Libraries and their vendor partners can build registries and metadata feeds that make MCP connectors for scholarly content findable, accessible, and usable.
Leadership in academia, publishing, funding, and across the supply chain must coordinate efforts to address research integrity. It is this collective responsibility that will restore and protect the credibility of research.
Today’s guest post is a call to action in support of OpenAlex and its role in author disambiguation.