How Much Citation Manipulation Is Acceptable?
Is citation manipulation a moral problem or an accounting problem?
Is citation manipulation a moral problem or an accounting problem?
A study by two respected economists suggests it may be time to admit that we made a mistake attributing a citation advantage to open access articles.
Designed to identify individuals who might be gaming their h-index score, the s-index may do more harm than good.
Attempts to game a journal’s Impact Factor can result in being de-listed from the Journal Citation Report. Most offenders learn their lesson and return to normal citation behavior.
The suppression of three economic history journals reveals more about Clarivate’s methods than citation manipulation.
Now we know how suppression decisions are made, should metrics companies suppress titles at all or simply make the underlying data more transparent?
A public allegation of citation manipulation among 5 journals deserves a public inquiry.
Citation indexes need to provide standardized citation histograms for editors and publishers. Without them, it is unlikely that they will be widely adopted. At worse, it will encourage the production of histograms that selectively highlight or obscure the data.
More and more studies are emerging showing how misdirecting and expanding citations can lead to long-term misconceptions and mistaken belief systems in the sciences.
How much can a single editor distort the citation record? Investigation documents rogue editor’s coercion of authors to cite his journal, papers.
A new paper demonstrates how easy it is to game Google Scholar citations, and how the system resists correction.
Fifty-one journals are suspended from the Journal Citation Report for “anomalous citation patterns.” Whether or not you agree with the impact factor, sanctions help maintain the integrity of the scientific publishing enterprise for everyone.
A proposal to substitute graphs of citation distributions for impact factors introduces many problems the authors don’t seem to have fully grasped, including unintentionally bolstering the importance of the very metric they seek to diminish.
Journal suppression is an effective tool for reducing high rates of self-citation, even years after a title is reintroduced.
Editors of business journals strategically coerce authors to increase citation rates, a new study in Science reports.