Luddite Horses and Why Your Job May Soon Cease to Exist
A sobering look at the coming “robot revolution”, and how for many jobs in the future, humans need not apply.
A sobering look at the coming “robot revolution”, and how for many jobs in the future, humans need not apply.
HBO’s John Oliver offers a numerically representative debate about climate change. While he accurately skewers how the media presents science, this “majority rules” approach may not be the best way to judge what’s right or wrong.
Please welcome our newest Chef, Jill O’Neill from the NFAIS.
On February 22, 2013, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) released a memorandum on, “Increasing Access to the Results of Federally Funded Scientific Research.” Today marks the first release of a funding agency’s plans to fulfill […]
We ask our authors to gaze into their crystal balls regarding the future of print.
Yesterday saw the release of the 2013 Impact Factors for scholarly journals. We present a look back at some favorite posts examining the Impact Factor.
FASEB’s Stand Up For Science competition winner brings perspective to the question of why we need to fund basic research.
The Scholarly Kitchen reaches a numerical milestone.
A fascinating look at a failed technology from 1964, and what it might have become.
Revisiting a 2012 post to ask, do journal authors really give their articles away for free to publishers?
A short video explaining the costs that go into producing a book, and how little difference there is in those costs between electronic and print books.
The Daily Show goes after the “glassholes”.
It’s been a crazy busy Spring for all at The Scholarly Kitchen and we’re taking a much needed week off.
This week marks the golden anniversary of the Science Citation Index, introduced by Eugene Garfield in 1964.
A reenactment of a legal deposition transcript offers some absurdity for your Friday.