Gaming the System: Do Promises of Citation Advantage Go Too Far?
Promises of more citations if authors pay are problematic in more ways than one.
Promises of more citations if authors pay are problematic in more ways than one.
Google and Facebook are battling, but looking more and more alike.
A best-selling author turns down a $500,000 advance in order to self-publish, while a self-published author who has earned $2 million takes a book contract. What’s going on here?
A new app for textbooks on the iPad has a lot of backers, and there’s a lot at stake.
The New York Times is likely to introduce institutional pricing now that it is beginning to charge for consumer access.
The Google Books Settlement actually hit its second roadblock this week. Here’s why, and where matter might go from here.
The Google Books Settlement hits a barrier. The implications of this will need to be sorted out over the coming days and weeks.
After years of debate, ACRL will finally “walk the talk.” But without a business model, they could get tripped up.
The HarperCollins e-book lending limitations provide lessons in how both sides typically deal with change.
The recent brouhaha about HarperCollins’ policy of restricting ebook circulation in libraries misses the larger point that libraries and publishers can work toward satisfying their respective interests.
Online news increases in popularity, online advertising grows, and an iPad newspaper pure-play exists — why does this all seem like bad news?
When you explore the revenue model of e-books vs. print books, some pricing practices make sense. But when you factor in the expenses, the logic begins to break down.
Transcribe Bentham loses its grant after six months, and has to wind down.
A fascinating talk from last month’s O’Reilly Tools of Change conference, in which Kevin Kelly talks about how the proliferation of screens, the incorporation of gestures and voice, the abundance of data streams, the notion of “always on,” and so […]
A report by the AAUP outlines the business models available to university presses and makes a case for ongoing subsidies by parent institutions.