Scholarly Communication — Can We Have Our Name Back?
How did “scholarly communication” become equated with open access advocacy? Is its misuse ultimately self-defeating?
How did “scholarly communication” become equated with open access advocacy? Is its misuse ultimately self-defeating?
A report by the AAUP outlines the business models available to university presses and makes a case for ongoing subsidies by parent institutions.
How can you make a movie about why some writing is good, some bad? This trailer makes it seem not only possible, but interesting.
[Phone rings.] Librarian: Hello? Sales Rep: Hello! Robert from Acme Scholarly Journals here. As you know, for the past year we’ve been working on a new pricing model for our journal package, and now that it’s ready my boss and […]
A new report from OCLC underscores how much water is already over, and how fragile the foundation has become.
For scholars to excel in the information age, technology needs to learn to learn. Perhaps highly specialized humans can help.
Why do smart people continue to seek simple rank-order listings of inherently complex phenomena?
What do you do? (a poll)
Wikipedia’s 10th anniversary must be acknowledged, and its seismic, worldwide redefinition of the reference work recognized.
It’s time to abandon the library-as-victim narrative and write a new story.
An essay in the New York Review of Books about the Google Books Settlement is based on flawed reasoning. Here’s why.
Image via Wikipedia Rather than choosing a “best” of my own posts, I’ve taken a step back to examine what I’ve written this year, in search of an article or theme upon which to expand. Surveying my 2010 contributions, main […]
What better way to show how to make a great PowerPoint than with PowerPoint examples?
Britain’s response to economic hard times might infect the US higher education system, and lead to major cuts in the humanities and social sciences.
When watching football on Thanksgiving, remember that those cheerleaders might have more to offer than pulchritude.