Google Book Settlement — Opponents 1, Google 0
The Google Books Settlement hits a barrier. The implications of this will need to be sorted out over the coming days and weeks.
The Google Books Settlement hits a barrier. The implications of this will need to be sorted out over the coming days and weeks.
After years of debate, ACRL will finally “walk the talk.” But without a business model, they could get tripped up.
The HarperCollins e-book lending limitations provide lessons in how both sides typically deal with change.
Online news increases in popularity, online advertising grows, and an iPad newspaper pure-play exists — why does this all seem like bad news?
When you explore the revenue model of e-books vs. print books, some pricing practices make sense. But when you factor in the expenses, the logic begins to break down.
The new Google Ebooks have made a mess of many popular classics in the public domain.
A fascinating talk from last month’s O’Reilly Tools of Change conference, in which Kevin Kelly talks about how the proliferation of screens, the incorporation of gestures and voice, the abundance of data streams, the notion of “always on,” and so […]
Alien life? Or just the will to publish, and some accomplices? While those in the field know the pecking order, those outside still get fooled.
The revolution in book publishing shares some aspects with revolutions everywhere. Here’s a short slideshow by the founder of Smashwords examining current motivations for authors.
How can you make a movie about why some writing is good, some bad? This trailer makes it seem not only possible, but interesting.
A new report from OCLC underscores how much water is already over, and how fragile the foundation has become.
Customers have accepted the analogy that they “buy” e-books, but publishers may be faced with accepting the fact that they’re selling licenses. What this could mean to their bottom lines may not be the most painful part of this shift.
For scholars to excel in the information age, technology needs to learn to learn. Perhaps highly specialized humans can help.
A new study suggests that reference works can be created cheaply and effectively through only mildly organized collaborations. Have we been missing a critical contribution of peer-review? Does it suggest that post-publication won’t review won’t be very effective?
A debate at PSP reveals much, especially after it ends.