The Beatles 3000 — An Exercise in Historical Drift Based on Incomplete Records
Scottie Pippen was a Beatle? Scholars a thousand years from now might just find evidence to suggest as much.
Scottie Pippen was a Beatle? Scholars a thousand years from now might just find evidence to suggest as much.
Authors use movies and songs to inspire the titles of their papers, often to unintentionally silly effect.
Why do smart people continue to seek simple rank-order listings of inherently complex phenomena?
Full of experimental biases and important omissions, what can be learned from the Study of Open Access Publishing (SOAP) survey of scientists?
John Battelle wonders if we’re painting ourselves into a corner with crude tools of identity. Instead, is there another way?
While we can tied up in the minutiae of scientific reporting and pursuits, the grand overall effect is impressive, as this video shows.
Now that the vaccine-autism link has been shown to be based on a fraud, will ego continue to trump humility in the face of evidence?
With the economic benefits of open access open to reinterpretation, will the moral benefits prove sufficient to withstand the coming scrutiny? And will it all begin a race to the bottom?
Extending our mental lives and creating communication wormholes — in addition to carrying more than we ever thought we could — is all the result of becoming cyborgs.
The artificiality of Internet inventions and experiences is about novelty, not artificiality. We’ve always been pretenders.
The truth isn’t disintegrating, but perhaps weaker or ad hoc theoretical frameworks are dissolving more quickly these days.
Why hasn’t scientific publishing been disrupted? The question created one of the year’s most-read posts.
A traffic phenomenon from a post about PLoS ONE may indicate that impact factors are more important to authors than PLoS believes.
The false premise of replacement means the future isn’t destructive, just additive.
A recent New York Times Magazine feature plays off fears that the next generation is prone to distraction and underachievement. The facts, and an apparently superior media outlet, argue otherwise.