Blogs Meet Academic Biases, Are Offered an Ironic Prize for Good Online Content
A new initiative to feature online content shows its cards when it names the ultimate honor it can convey on selections.
A new initiative to feature online content shows its cards when it names the ultimate honor it can convey on selections.
A new study being touted by Nicholas Carr reveals a lack of healthy skepticism and more problems with “methodologically sound.”
Words persist, but the form they take can change something fundamental in their meaning.
The downside of silent filters becomes crystal clear in this important talk.
Instead of filling in the blanks of attribution with the same old agents, maybe we need to go beyond the usual suspects.
A Library Journal survey shows things are about the same. But who are they really talking to?
The mental models associated with print are still defining how we work and design. Why has this persisted?
Are librarians making the same mistake railroads made — forgetting their purpose to remain tied to their physical heritage?
From the archive: an interview of a medical ghostwriter and an inside view of the medical communications industry — both speakers featured at the 2011 SSP Annual Meeting.
The Drudge Report provides a useful service and drives a disproportionate amount of news traffic. Could academics be disciplined enough to emulate it?
Humor about scientific misconduct may reflect a deeper, more serious side of academic culture gone wrong.
Privacy concerns seem aimed at the small stuff, but could expand into a system of censorship.
Nostalgia about the book will be upon us soon enough. But we’ve been down similar paths before, and so have prior generations.
This week, we revisit the power of persuasion, and wonder out loud if perhaps publishers suffer from traits that hold back engagement.
They’ve made a movie about a newspaper’s travails in the Internet age.