Guest Post: Kent Anderson UPDATED — 96 Things Publishers Do (2016 Edition)
Kent Anderson returns to update his essential list of just what it is that publishers do.
Kent Anderson returns to update his essential list of just what it is that publishers do.
23andMe presents an interesting model for STM publishers on how to enter a new and lucrative market for data publishing.
The network effect is a peculiar thing. It can be about lolcats or insurrection. Either way, it’s a new and different power.
Fifteen years later, the authors of the “Cluetrain Manifesto” attempt a relevant update, with 112 new “clues.” Yet, they miss the biggest clue of all — the Internet is no longer sacred and its users know it.
The annual update to the list adds some important items overlooked on prior versions, including design, enforcement of editorial policies, and Board interactions.
An updated version of the “60 Things Publishers Do” list, recognizing a baker’s dozen of contributions provided via comments, other Chefs, and a changing world.
Revisiting an attempt to list the things journal publishers do.
An attempt to list a bunch of things journal publishers do. It’s not perfect, but it’s better than nothing.
What is text mining? The CCC’s Roy Kaufman offers a primer for publishers.
Geezers blog. Why? Because they have something to say and are willing to say it.
Looking back at Richard Poynder’s in-depth analysis of the state of open access. What’s changed since then?
New research demonstrates that there’s a decent likelihood that your data exhaust can be used to find out sensitive things about you.
Some were surprised GetFTR wasn’t immediately welcomed by the library community. @lisalibrarian analyzes why.
A recent opinion paper by Richard Poynder @rickypo offers analysis and prognostication with regard to the current state and future prospects of #openaccess and the open access movement.
At a press conference on Friday last week, the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) unsealed indictments of nine Iranian citizens. This sentence is an odd way to start a Scholarly Kitchen post, admittedly. What makes this case interesting to […]