[…] what they prefer to keep private. No single technology can, or should, make decisions on behalf of the researcher. Elsevier’s privacy principles are a good example of this: When we design and develop products we adhere to these principles and […]
[…] for users, to be sure, but social login to scholarly resources controlled by an advertising company should raise concerns about privacy. Moreover, depending on who controls social login and how it is offered, it can provide an unprecedented understanding of […]
[…] holds in store for us, and whether future governments will honor the trust we put in them to protect information privacy rights.” While some portray this as a “freedom of the press” issue, I don’t see it. Are we supposed […]
[…] know from experience that the more information they possess about customers, the more things they can sell. But what about privacy? There is something unpleasant about discovering that your personal information (your purchasing history, your method of payment, your zip […]
[…] overlooking? What regrets will our medical research peers have in their dotage? What biases are shared when we share data? Privacy is also a concern (as noted in a comment yesterday, with an emphasis on the Helsinki Declaration), and big […]
[…] the “Site”), you acknowledge that you have read and understood the processes and policies referred to in this Notice. This privacy policy is incorporated into and is a part of the Terms and Conditions of Use of our Site. 2. […]
[…] cross-functional alignment, and shared ownership of AI initiatives. Responsible AI Principles as Core Strategy Human oversight, fairness, transparency, accountability, and privacy were emphasized. AI systems must be auditable, interpretable, and secure by design. For Publishers: This is fundamental when designing […]
[…] its letter urging the FTC to block Clarivate’s acquisition of ProQuest, SPARC argued that “the merger [sic] would compromise user privacy,” so perhaps advocacy organizations will weigh in on the surveillance and privacy implications of the Interfolio acquisition. As in […]
[…] dual-language programming, “How Latin America Is (Quietly) Revolutionizing Open Research” (available in both Portuguese and English), as well as “Bringing Privacy and Personalization into Conversation rather than Conflict,” a thought-provoking discussion on the challenges of balancing seamless access to content […]
[…] the REFEDS map demonstrates. Alongside our conversations about how to streamline SAML setups for libraries and institute optional levels of privacy to suit a range of institutional policies, it was clear in these sessions that building on an identity-based infrastructure […]
[…] three models of usage disaggregation. Gathering this data in real-time might prove too labor-intensive, and perhaps infringe further on user privacy than most librarians are comfortable with. Instead, a sampling exercise could be performed a few times a year via […]
[…] and outcomes in a secure environment. Since its inception, Unizin has taken steps to become the industry leader in the privacy and security space. Unizin has appointed an assurance officer who has organized a Privacy Task Force and a Security […]
[…] of its warnings about how to think about the genetic information and its chorus that it will not violate your privacy in any way. You can hear the lawyers behind this. The company clearly spent many months attempting to get […]
[…] resided in the application of large-scale user data to personalize services. Of course, balancing this are concerns about user data privacy, the new General Data Protection Guidelines in the EU, the ability of users to opt out, and how individual […]
[…] the human stain leaves its trace. The new Cluetrain is not very good, basically. It attempts to cover issues like privacy, trolls, spying, marketing, and etiquette in the same jaunty way as the initial manifesto, but falls flat and seems […]