Continuing our Peer Review Week celebrations, we asked representatives from three very different organizations – the American Historical Association, BioMed Central and The Royal Society – to share their thoughts on the evolution of peer review for journals from its beginnings through the present and into the future.
While BioMed Central’s responses are a mixed bag, a new finding surfaces. And this one might just beat all.
Is the growth of open access journals a sign of market success or dysfunction? Two new studies analyze the data and come to opposite conclusions.
Let’s put aside all the controversy about open access publishing and come up with an OA plan that will work.