The Scholarly Kitchen

What’s Hot and Cooking In Scholarly Publishing

  • About
  • Archives
  • Collections
    Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    Collections
    • Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    • Academia
    • Business Models
    • Discovery and Access
    • Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility
    • Economics
    • Libraries
    • Marketing
    • Metrics and Analytics
    • Open Access
    • Organizational Management
    • Peer Review
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology and Disruption
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow

Archives: CRediT

Next Steps for CRediT – An Interview with the Co-Chairs

With CRediT now formalized as a standard, Alice Meadows interviews Liz Allen, Simon Kerridge, and Alison McGonagle O’Connell (cochairs of the working group) about what’s next for the taxonomy

  • By Alice Meadows
  • May 24, 2022
  • 3 Comments

Can We Re-engineer Scholarly Journal Publishing? An Interview with Richard Wynne, Rescognito

In today’s post, chefs Alice Meadows and Tim Vines interview Richard Wynne, Founder of Rescognito, a free service for recognizing and promoting Open Research.

  • By Alice Meadows, Tim Vines
  • Mar 8, 2021
  • 8 Comments

Beyond Publication — Increasing Opportunities For Recognizing All Research Contributions

Recognizing the many ways that researchers (and others) contribute to science and scholarship has historically been challenging but we now have options, including CRediT and ORCID.

  • By Alice Meadows
  • Aug 12, 2020
  • 14 Comments

Revisiting: The Problem(s) With Credit for Peer Review

Do we need more metrics, or can some questions be answered more easily?

  • By David Crotty
  • Jan 28, 2016
  • 25 Comments

The Problem(s) With Credit for Peer Review

Offering researchers credit for performing peer review seems, on the surface, like a good idea. But implementing such a scheme raises some problematic questions.

  • By David Crotty
  • Jun 17, 2015
  • 37 Comments

Challenges, Connections, Conversations, and Collaboration – Lessons from the May 2015 ORCID-CASRAI Conference

The recent ORCID-CASRAI conference in Barcelona brought together over 150 researchers, research administrators, funders, publishers, vendors, and others working in scholarly communications to discuss research evaluation, with a particular focus on social science and humanities – resulting in some interesting conversations and observations

  • By Alice Meadows
  • Jun 8, 2015
  • 8 Comments

Official Blog of:

Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The Chefs

  • Rick Anderson
  • Todd A Carpenter
  • Michael Clarke
  • Angela Cochran
  • Lettie Y. Conrad
  • David Crotty
  • Phil Davis
  • Joseph Esposito
  • Robert Harington
  • Siân Harris
  • Haseeb Irfanullah
  • Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
  • Phill Jones
  • Scholarly Kitchen
  • Judy Luther
  • Alice Meadows
  • Ann Michael
  • Alison Mudditt
  • Jill O'Neill
  • Charlie Rapple
  • Dianndra Roberts
  • Roger C. Schonfeld
  • David Smith
  • Tao Tao
  • Tim Vines
  • Jasmine Wallace
  • Karin Wulf

Most Recent

  • Still Ambiguous at Best? Revisiting “If We Don’t Know What Citations Mean, What Does it Mean When We Count Them”
  • Guest Post — Has Peer Review Created a Toxic Culture in Academia? Moving from ‘Battering’ to ‘Bettering’ in the Review of Academic Research
  • Keeping Publishing Infrastructure Independent

Recent Tweets

Retweet on Twitter Scholarly Kitchen Retweeted
jeroensh Jeroen van de Weijer 🇺🇦🚜🌻🇺🇦 @jeroensh ·
6h

Still Ambiguous at Best? Revisiting "If We Don’t Know What #Citations Mean, What Does it Mean When We Count Them"

#science #metrics
https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2022/08/17/still-ambiguous-at-best-revisiting-if-we-dont-know-what-citations-mean-what-does-it-mean-when-we-count-them/ via @scholarlykitchn

Retweet on Twitter Scholarly Kitchen Retweeted
justzatch Zach Breneman @justzatch ·
8h

This and the post from @scholarlykitchn are points I think a lot of folks will want to save.

Guest Post -- Has Peer Review Created a Toxic Culture in Academia? Moving from ‘Battering’ to ‘Bettering’ in the Review of Academic Research https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2022/08/16/guest-post-has-peer-review-created-a-toxic-culture-in-academia-moving-from-battering-to-bettering-in-the-review-of-academic-research/ via @scholarlykitchn https://twitter.com/LabSpecEth/status/1560017958641881088

Lab of Spec still masking! @LabSpecEth

@natureB I had a request for a thread on how to best get started and be effective as a peer reviewer. So here are some thoughts.🧵

Retweet on Twitter Scholarly Kitchen Retweeted
kawulf Karin Wulf @kawulf ·
8h

I'd like to think a lot has changed in the last 7 years --how we better understand the nature of citation and the implications of those metrics. But I'm not sure it has. What do you think? Drop a comment on the post... 4//

Follow the Scholarly Kitchen Blog Follow Us
Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The mission of the Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP) is to advance scholarly publishing and communication, and the professional development of its members through education, collaboration, and networking. SSP established The Scholarly Kitchen blog in February 2008 to keep SSP members and interested parties aware of new developments in publishing.

The Scholarly Kitchen is a moderated and independent blog. Opinions on The Scholarly Kitchen are those of the authors. They are not necessarily those held by the Society for Scholarly Publishing nor by their respective employers.

  • About
  • Archives
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Website Credits
ISSN 2690-8085