Guest Post — A Conversation about the Reality of Neurodiversity
Katy Alexander and Ruth Wells talk about their experience of neurodiversity as part of the Publishing Inclusion Enabled group mission
Katy Alexander and Ruth Wells talk about their experience of neurodiversity as part of the Publishing Inclusion Enabled group mission
Jennifer Regala discusses the pursuit of the “R” word — how to drive your career in scholarly publishing by remaining relevant.
Meredith Adinolfi and Sara Grimme speak with Vicky Truter, Adya Misra, and Sai Konda about their experiences and participation in SSP’s Fellowship and Mentorship programs.
Send in your proposals for sessions at the 2021 SSP Annual Meeting.
The beginning of the holiday season means it’s time for our annual list of our favorite books read during the year (and more!) . Part 2.
The beginning of the holiday season means it’s time for our annual list of our favorite books read during the year (and more!). Part 1 today, Part 2 tomorrow.
Why aren’t we overrun with gigantic bacteria? It’s a matter of diffusion.
Christos Petrou looks at the impact on publication volumes, and what that might mean for next year.
Mark Thomas discusses lessons learned in moving ALPSP’s face-to-face workshops into an online offerings.
What does it take to research and develop a new product? Here we describe a recently launched service, DataSeer, and share top tips from its founder, Tim Vines.
A look at Thieme’s “Select Crowd Review” approach to peer review.
Breaking news — tardigrades are even more amazing than you thought.
Journal offices are reporting greater participation and engagement in virtual editorial boards meetings; but providing networking opportunities at these meetings for volunteers might outweigh the benefits of virtual. Angela Cochran interviews colleagues on what makes these meetings a success and what we can do better.
Collecting some key posts on scholarly communications during the pandemic, as we enter into a new wave of infection.
Last week the UK government COVID held a press briefing in an attempt to get the country behind new travel and social restrictions. What lessons can we learn from this bad example of how not to present evidence to support our positions?