Guest Post – Perspectives on a “Unified Approach” to the Future of Open Access
There is value in exploring the concept of different perspectives on open access in order to begin to develop a “unified approach to open”.
There is value in exploring the concept of different perspectives on open access in order to begin to develop a “unified approach to open”.
Adeline Rosenberg offers a look into the value of providing plain language summaries in research papers, and the standards created for doing so.
Part 2 of this series looking at open access developments in Canada examines the changing processes and infrastructure needs for open science.
Why aren’t libraries providing support for your open access or open science initiative? Be careful what you assume.
Global initiatives in open are decentralized and disconnected, lacking researcher input and buy-in. An “opens solutions” approach can both embrace and leverage that diversity, ensuring that it all contributes to the greater whole.
Preprints play a crucial role in open science but offer an opportunity to be gamed. Fictitious authorship in preprints show that open science needs checks and we need to collaborate to govern Open Science.
Transparency around research methodologies is essential for driving public trust and accurate, reproducible research results.
Robert Harington asks if we need more than Open Access (OA) to truly democratize science?
Last week Wiley acquired Hindawi for $298M or a multiple of 7.45 based on 2020 Hindawi revenue. Hear why and what comes next from Wiley’s EVP of Research, Judy Verses, and VP of Open Research, Liz Ferguson.
Publishers have retracted more than 20 COVID-related papers. Are they learning from their mistakes and fixing process failures?
The COVID pandemic may leave us stuck between a growing consensus that open science is the superior way to drive progress and an inability to invest what may be needed to make it happen.
On February 26th, Phill Jones gate-crashed the 2nd STM association research data workshop. Here’s what he learned about the progress being made and that challenges ahead in making data sharable, open, and maybe even FAIR.
Rob Johnson of Research Consulting and Vanessa Proudman of SPARC Europe look at a recent survey of of European funders to explore what’s being done to drive change in scholarly communication, and argue that funders’ open policies could be backed up more by funders’ own practices.
While some talk about global science, China’s skyrocketing investment in its scientific sector is causing real anxiety for Europe.
Where will FAIR end up? What will be its value to research data management stakeholders? To see into the future, Brian Lavoie of OCLC suggests we start by looking into the past in this guest post.