It’s been “the year of generative AI”, so I thought I’d ask ChatGPT to help me write some cracker-standard Christmas jokes with a scholarly communications theme. Despite my expert prompt engineering, the results were terrible, so I have mixed in some of my own efforts — see if you can tell which is which. Enjoy.
Discussion
3 Thoughts on "Scholarly Communications Meets your Christmas Cracker"
Thanks, Charlie. I had a good chuckle. Enjoy the holiday season!
It’s a tradition to have some really bad ones in the cracker box, right? Enjoy your holidays and best wishes for a healthy and happy 2024.
I asked ChatGPT to write a BMJ Journals themed Twelve Days of Christmas and it didn’t disappoint (and adorned my out-of-office for the Christmas period):
πΆ On the twelfth day of publishing, BMJ gave to me, Twelve reviewers reviewing, eleven editors editing, ten global collaborations, nine podcasts playing, eight citations soaring, seven graphs a-rising, six editorial insights, five impact factors! Four open access articles, three research themes, two peer reviews, and a groundbreaking study on a pear tree. πβοΈππ€ποΈπππππππππ
Quite what a ground-breaking study on a pear tree would mean I’m unsure (sounds out of scope for BMJ, unless there’s a climate element to the planting of a tree or the nutritional benefits of pears). 12 reviewers reviewing resulting in only receiving 2 peer reviews was very astute of ChatGPT.