Our First Anniversary in the Kitchen
The Scholarly Kitchen is one year old today! Read an anniversary entry, then help us celebrate by leaving us a cheery comment!
The Scholarly Kitchen is one year old today! Read an anniversary entry, then help us celebrate by leaving us a cheery comment!
E-publishing ties content to a platform — one that is often bereft of aesthetics and craft. Is this why digital publishing still leaves people cold?
Are devices proliferating because we are seeking boundaries in our information age? The concept of “device psychology” suggests as much.
Free scientific articles improve scholarship in developing countries. Subscription journals largely responsible.
Attending a conference in the Age of Twitter is even more meaningful and involving.
Creating Kindle and iPhone versions of a book — simple. Selling them is another thing entirely.
Ann Michael joins the Scholarly Kitchen. Welcome!
A new study suggests that the venerated journal impact factor (JIF) may not provide a consensus view of “scientific impact.”
Image by George Eastman House via Flickr Abraham Lincoln, one of America’s greatest orators and a writer and speaker who influenced our penchant for simple language and short, punchy text, probably never finished working on his speeches, introducing ad libs […]
The US stimulus package supports science and higher education, wise investments now and for the long haul.
The 2008 update of “Did You Know?” continues its mind-blowing tradition.
Think email’s a thing of the past? Think again.
Newspapers are running out of ideas. A litany of desperate measures don’t bode well for a dying industry.
Indexing of proceedings papers, errors in conversion, draw ire from bibliometrics community. Some question its effect on journal Impact Factors.
On a day when Kindle 2.0 is expected the debut, the e-book is just one force reshaping the book of the future.