OA Rhetoric, Economics, and the Definition of "Research"
Rhetoric can’t hide financial realities. Is trading research for access a good use of funds?
Rhetoric can’t hide financial realities. Is trading research for access a good use of funds?
A compelling essay points out some interesting wrinkles to the access debate.
An experiment in agile book publishing reveals some interesting divisions between process and form.
Rebuttals are cited less, don’t change citation patterns for original papers, and generally fall flat. And you thought science was self-correcting?
The price of typos exists, but the price of not seeing solutions that are right in front of you could be higher.
Overburdened by supplemental data, journal limits publication to “essentials” plus non-article formats.
While all sustainable publishing requires funding, where the funding comes from, why it’s provided, who provides it, when it’s provided, and what they expect for it sheds some light on some key issues.
The Harry Potter series will now be available as e-books. Among the lessons for publishers is the desirability of direct-marketing.
PressForward has a lot of potential, but a lot of potential barriers to overcome. How it fares will depend on how much the larger culture of academia is interested in change.
A new initiative to feature online content shows its cards when it names the ultimate honor it can convey on selections.
A new study being touted by Nicholas Carr reveals a lack of healthy skepticism and more problems with “methodologically sound.”
As spam defines one end of abundance, targeting enters to deflect the damage. Can they co-exist? Or will one become the defining trait of the age?
Words persist, but the form they take can change something fundamental in their meaning.
Hype and marketing angles aren’t adequate ways to truly help real people succeed in the information age.
Revisiting a popular and important post — the editorial fallacy, that belief that more or better manuscripts can save you from disruptive change.