Privatizing Peer Review — The PubCred Proposal
When authors are unwilling to peer review and incentives are not enough, is it time to privatize the system?
When authors are unwilling to peer review and incentives are not enough, is it time to privatize the system?
How do we gain a better vantage amidst the dust and din of an ongoing information revolution the likes of which the world has never seen before?
In a disruptive publishing environment, publishers cannot rely on a purely editorial strategy, as many of the issues now facing them are not editorial in nature.
The infrastructure for change is in place and largely working. What might that mean for publishing and academic cultures? (The first of a four-part series.)
Rainbows are much more common in near-ground sprinklers than they were 20 years ago. Or so asserts the infamous “Rainbow Lady.”
Philadelphia extends local small business fees to bloggers making money, arguing they are just like anyone else trying to make money in the city. But given the free speech element, they aren’t “just like anyone else.”
The now completely discredited vaccines and autism linkage is tackled here in inimitable and definitive style by two guys who really know how to stage a story simply and effectively.
Brutal and compelling, the lifecycle of the plastic bag is beautifully captured in this short film.
Supplemental data undermine scientific integrity by undermining the peer review process.
A town in the UK abandons traffic lights, to surprising effect.
After one year, most COPE funds remain unspent. Is it time to revise the policy?
Open blogging networks may be impossible to commercialize, for a host of reasons.
In this clip, a mother (and sportscaster) recounts the devastating game of badminton and its effects on her life.
When brands, credibility, and trust all stumble, what is an increasingly weary public supposed to think?
The US Federal Trade Commission and Google spar openly over the future of journalism. Guess which one comes out looking more modern?