Many society publishers, concerned about the disruptive implications, of Plan S, are nervously considering selling off their publishing assets.
Mimi Calter, Deputy University Librarian for Stanford, offers a useful framework for libraries as they consider patron privacy.
A review of Academic Freedom the latest book in Oxford University Press’s series Engaging Philosophy.
Last week, the University of California terminated its license with Elsevier. Today, Roger Schonfeld argues that leakage has reduced the value of the big deal — and publisher pricing power — while empowering library negotiators.
A pilot project representing the first significant experiment with the syndication of publisher content to a content supercontinent.
What happens when regulations around research funding pit the interests of the laboratory head against those of their students and postdocs?
If you’re a scholarly and scientific author and you think the open access movement is irrelevant to your interests, think again.
As we await the next communication from Coalition S, the largest publishers indicate that they will not abandon the hybrid pathway for open access.
With thousand of pages of feedback on the Plans S implementation guidance, what themes emerged that might guide next steps? By @lisalibrarian
Famed detective Sherlock Holmes does his best to help his friend Dr. Watson figure out how best to comply with the requirements of Plan S.
In this article, Robert Harington implores Plan S leaders and funders to take researcher needs to heart.
What the public wants is better science, not open science. Plan S has put those two forces in conflict, and it is driving everybody crazy.
Happy New Year! Does it feel like everything is happening at once? Welcome to The Great Acceleration.
The separation of powers is as important in academic publishing as it is in government.
A public allegation of citation manipulation among 5 journals deserves a public inquiry.