PLoS' 2010 Progress Update — Pondering the Implications of a Watershed Year
PLoS turns its first surplus. What will this mean for an organization accustomed to acting like the rebel?
PLoS turns its first surplus. What will this mean for an organization accustomed to acting like the rebel?
The comments on a recent post revealed a litany of rhetoric that doesn’t quite match up with nuanced reality.
Simplifying the complex isn’t a simple task. A new book by a practiced hand and statistician proves entertaining and enlightening.
A retraction study hits some familiar conceptual problems, and a proposed retraction index runs into a deeper issue.
Publishers habitually adopt a pessimistic outlook about their business, but the trends for the industry are very good. Pessimism is the real problem.
A recent analysis suggests some worrisome trends for librarianship.
Following users across the Web is an increasingly common way to expand ad inventory. But can scholarly publishers expect users to accept it?
The attention economy gets a theatrical/thriller treatment. Time is money.
Smaller animals, smaller planets, smaller elements, and fewer effective drugs — is science becoming lower-yield, even at the paradigm level?
Google and Apple have different cultures. One is thriving while one has chosen a different path. That choice may prove significant.
Rebuttals are cited less, don’t change citation patterns for original papers, and generally fall flat. And you thought science was self-correcting?
New research demonstrates that there’s a decent likelihood that your data exhaust can be used to find out sensitive things about you.
As budgets make librarians look for better deals, the Big Deals fall under close scrutiny.
How we think often leads to what we think. Are you publishing using the metaphors users are adopting?
Does the success of the scalable, multidisciplinary open access mega journal signal the imminent demise of the specialized, highly-selective subscription journal?