The Scholarly Kitchen

What’s Hot and Cooking In Scholarly Publishing

  • About
  • Archives
  • Collections
    Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    Collections
    • Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    • Academia
    • Business Models
    • Discovery and Access
    • Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility
    • Economics
    • Libraries
    • Marketing
    • Mental Health Awareness
    • Metrics and Analytics
    • Open Access
    • Organizational Management
    • Peer Review
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology and Disruption
  • Translations
    topographic world map
    Translations
    • All Translations
    • Chinese
    • German
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Spanish
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow

Archives: Metrics and Analytics

The Rise of China: Data Show How Science Follows Economic Growth

Within a few short years, China has become an economic and scientific powerhouse. Watch the dynamic bubble plot.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Jan 26, 2011
  • 30 Comments
  • Time To Read: 2 mins

Should Our Information Experiences Be Dependent or Independent?

John Battelle wonders if we’re painting ourselves into a corner with crude tools of identity. Instead, is there another way?

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Jan 25, 2011
  • 9 Comments
  • Time To Read: 2 mins

How Many Spaces After a Period?

What do you do? (a poll)

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Jan 22, 2011
  • 21 Comments
  • Time To Read: < 1 min

The Healthy, Wealthy Corner — What 200 Years of Scientific Progress Can Do

While we can tied up in the minutiae of scientific reporting and pursuits, the grand overall effect is impressive, as this video shows.

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Jan 21, 2011
  • 4 Comments
  • Time To Read: < 1 min

Don't Look Back — Do Scientists Squelch Citations to Justify Claims of Novelty?

A study showing that randomized controlled trials don’t cite much of the preceding literature suggests there’s a problem, but it’s unclear exactly what the problem is.

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Jan 20, 2011
  • 24 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

How Meaningful and Reliable Are Social Article Metrics?

New publishing initiatives link concepts like “importance” to social metrics like popularity and sharing. Is this logical? Can these metrics be easily gamed?

  • By David Crotty
  • Jan 19, 2011
  • 8 Comments
  • Time To Read: 5 mins

Poor Comparison Leaves Darnton's Journal Price Jeremiad in Jambles

It’s time to abandon the library-as-victim narrative and write a new story.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Jan 10, 2011
  • 16 Comments
  • Time To Read: 5 mins

10 New Business Models in 2010 — A Primer on Innovation

Want to see the business models behind PatientsLikeMe.com, Groupon, and Spotify? Here they are, along with 7 others from 2010.

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Jan 10, 2011
  • 6 Comments
  • Time To Read: < 1 min

Will Your Next Editors Be Cyborgs or Robots?

As new analytical tools emerge, editors can harness them to advance their craft — or find their craft automated out of their hands.

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Jan 6, 2011
  • 5 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Diverging Content Preferences: Is Baby Bear's Disappearance Cause for Worry?

Short-form and long-form content are flourishing, while that “just right” middle ground is vanishing.

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Jan 5, 2011
  • 9 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Prediction for 2011 — The Individual Rules!

In 2011, the power of the individual consumer will set your strategies.

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Jan 4, 2011
  • 13 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Phil's Pick for 2010: The Unintended Use of a Blog Post

A traffic phenomenon from a post about PLoS ONE may indicate that impact factors are more important to authors than PLoS believes.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Dec 27, 2010
  • 0 Comments
  • Time To Read: < 1 min

Trouble Recruiting Peer-Reviewers? Blame Spam!

A problem in recruiting competent peer-reviewers may be the fault of email spam blockers, not the unwillingness of academics to review.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Dec 23, 2010
  • 9 Comments
  • Time To Read: 2 mins

David's Pick for 2010: Peer Review May Be Old and Imperfect, But It Still Works

After wondering at the supposed burden of peer-review, more evidence emerged that it still works well, and is probably less taxing than other alternatives.

  • By David Crotty
  • Dec 23, 2010
  • 3 Comments
  • Time To Read: 4 mins

For Open Access Journals, Size Does Matter

Is the growth of open access journals a sign of market success or dysfunction? Two new studies analyze the data and come to opposite conclusions.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Dec 16, 2010
  • 17 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Posts pagination

Prev 1 … 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 … 50 Next

Search and filter fields can be used in combination to refine results.

Filter By

Official Blog of:

Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The Chefs

  • Rick Anderson
  • Todd A Carpenter
  • Angela Cochran
  • Lettie Y. Conrad
  • David Crotty
  • Ashutosh Ghildiyal
  • Roohi Ghosh
  • Robert Harington
  • Haseeb Irfanullah
  • Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
  • Phill Jones
  • Roy Kaufman
  • Scholarly Kitchen
  • Stephanie Lovegrove Hansen
  • Alice Meadows
  • Alison Mudditt
  • Charlie Rapple
  • Dianndra Roberts
  • Maryam Sayab
  • Roger C. Schonfeld
  • Avi Staiman
  • Randy Townsend
  • Tim Vines
  • Hong Zhou

Interested in writing for The Scholarly Kitchen? Learn more.

Most Recent

  • Guest Post — Improving OpenAlex Data: Why Publishers Should Help Authors Improve the Scholarly Record
  • Guest Post — All this AI Signal and Noise: What Deserves Action Now
  • Guest Post — Defining Our Future: Reassessing What, How, and Why We Publish

SSP News

Call for Proposals: Presentations and Panelists — Student Journal Symposium 2027

Oct 21, 2026

Access Innovations Inc. Earns Family Friendly Business Award® At the GOLD Level

Oct 21, 2026

The Company of Biologists Renews Read & Publish Agreement with the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)

Oct 21, 2026
Follow the Scholarly Kitchen Blog Follow Us
Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The mission of the Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP) is to advance scholarly publishing and communication, and the professional development of its members through education, collaboration, and networking. SSP established The Scholarly Kitchen blog in February 2008 to keep SSP members and interested parties aware of new developments in publishing.

The Scholarly Kitchen is a moderated and independent blog. Opinions on The Scholarly Kitchen are those of the authors. They are not necessarily those held by the Society for Scholarly Publishing nor by their respective employers.

  • About
  • Archives
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Website Credits
ISSN 2690-8085