The Scholarly Kitchen

What’s Hot and Cooking In Scholarly Publishing

  • About
  • Archives
  • Collections
    Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    Collections
    • Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    • Academia
    • Business Models
    • Discovery and Access
    • Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility
    • Economics
    • Libraries
    • Marketing
    • Mental Health Awareness
    • Metrics and Analytics
    • Open Access
    • Organizational Management
    • Peer Review
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology and Disruption
  • Translations
    topographic world map
    Translations
    • All Translations
    • Chinese
    • German
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Spanish
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow

Archives: Peer Review

When Fraud Hits Medical Science: The Decade of the Vaccine-Autism Scandal

Now that the vaccine-autism link has been shown to be based on a fraud, will ego continue to trump humility in the face of evidence?

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Jan 17, 2011
  • 10 Comments
  • Time To Read: 5 mins

Ben Goldacre: A Gift to Skepticism

An interesting and entertaining debunking of some obvious fluffs in medical science, with a chilling reminder of how libel laws in some countries can kill scientific discourse.

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Jan 14, 2011
  • 1 Comment
  • Time To Read: < 1 min

Morality and Economics: Is a Trapdoor Opening Beneath Open Access?

With the economic benefits of open access open to reinterpretation, will the moral benefits prove sufficient to withstand the coming scrutiny? And will it all begin a race to the bottom?

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Jan 12, 2011
  • 25 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Wikipedia Turns 10 — Let's Celebrate It!

Wikipedia’s 10th anniversary must be acknowledged, and its seismic, worldwide redefinition of the reference work recognized.

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Jan 11, 2011
  • 7 Comments
  • Time To Read: < 1 min

Michael's Pick for 2010: The Disruption (or Not) of Scientific Publishing

Why hasn’t scientific publishing been disrupted? The question created one of the year’s most-read posts.

  • By Michael Clarke
  • Dec 29, 2010
  • 5 Comments
  • Time To Read: < 1 min

Open Access Repositories Lack Trust — But Is Trust Really Necessary?

Should institutional open access repositories be run like journals?

  • By Phil Davis
  • Dec 27, 2010
  • 4 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Trouble Recruiting Peer-Reviewers? Blame Spam!

A problem in recruiting competent peer-reviewers may be the fault of email spam blockers, not the unwillingness of academics to review.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Dec 23, 2010
  • 9 Comments
  • Time To Read: 2 mins

David's Pick for 2010: Peer Review May Be Old and Imperfect, But It Still Works

After wondering at the supposed burden of peer-review, more evidence emerged that it still works well, and is probably less taxing than other alternatives.

  • By David Crotty
  • Dec 23, 2010
  • 3 Comments
  • Time To Read: 4 mins

Kent's Picks for 2010: The Wikification of Research Reports

The movement to publish more and more demands that we find ways to preserve the trust we’ve built while taking advantage of the sunlight public availability can provide.

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Dec 22, 2010
  • 1 Comment
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Should Open Access Journals Charge Submission Fees?

If submission fees result in a more sustainable business model, why are open access publishers opposed to the idea?

  • By Phil Davis
  • Dec 9, 2010
  • 9 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Weighing the Costs and Benefits of Open Peer-Review

Do the benefits of open peer-review outweigh the costs? A BMJ study argues “yes,” but there are caveats.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Nov 30, 2010
  • 16 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Sage Open: Open Access Publishing Comes to the Social Sciences, Humanities

Is there demand for open access journals in the social sciences and humanities? Or does Sage see opportunities in unspent equity funds?

  • By Phil Davis
  • Nov 22, 2010
  • 21 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

The Reboxetine Scandal — How Should We Make Medical Trial Data Available?

Another scandal rocks medical journal publishing. It’s time to stop pretending journals can salvage this on their own. It’s time to bring modern solutions to bear.

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Nov 16, 2010
  • 10 Comments
  • Time To Read: 4 mins

Dueling Michael Caine Impersonations

Who impersonates Michael Caine better? You be the judge.

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Nov 12, 2010
  • 1 Comment
  • Time To Read: < 1 min

The Price of Transparency and Peer Review

EMBO opens up the black box of peer-review. Is it worth the cost?

  • By Phil Davis
  • Nov 11, 2010
  • 10 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Posts pagination

Prev 1 … 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 … 45 Next

Search and filter fields can be used in combination to refine results.

Filter By

Official Blog of:

Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The Chefs

  • Rick Anderson
  • Todd A Carpenter
  • Angela Cochran
  • Lettie Y. Conrad
  • David Crotty
  • Joseph Esposito
  • Ashutosh Ghildiyal
  • Roohi Ghosh
  • Robert Harington
  • Haseeb Irfanullah
  • Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
  • Phill Jones
  • Roy Kaufman
  • Scholarly Kitchen
  • Stephanie Lovegrove Hansen
  • Alice Meadows
  • Alison Mudditt
  • Jill O'Neill
  • Charlie Rapple
  • Dianndra Roberts
  • Maryam Sayab
  • Roger C. Schonfeld
  • Avi Staiman
  • Randy Townsend
  • Tim Vines
  • Hong Zhou

Interested in writing for The Scholarly Kitchen? Learn more.

Most Recent

  • Ask the Chefs: SSP 2026 Annual Meeting
  • The Rise of China’s Scholarly Publishing System Part 2: Navigating China’s Publishing Ambition — Strategic Options for International Publishers
  • The Rise of China’s Scholarly Publishing System Part 1: China’s Journal Ecosystem Is Accelerating

SSP News

Latest “Pulse Check” Poll focuses on Social Media in Scholarly Communications

Jun 1, 2026

Announcing the Winners of the 2026 EPIC Awards

May 29, 2026

Celebrating Our 48th Annual Meeting Sponsors!

May 21, 2026
Follow the Scholarly Kitchen Blog Follow Us
Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The mission of the Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP) is to advance scholarly publishing and communication, and the professional development of its members through education, collaboration, and networking. SSP established The Scholarly Kitchen blog in February 2008 to keep SSP members and interested parties aware of new developments in publishing.

The Scholarly Kitchen is a moderated and independent blog. Opinions on The Scholarly Kitchen are those of the authors. They are not necessarily those held by the Society for Scholarly Publishing nor by their respective employers.

  • About
  • Archives
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Website Credits
ISSN 2690-8085