Competing Views of Intellectual “Property”
The NIH Public Access Policy debate can be better understood through the lenses of competing Intellectual Property theories.
The NIH Public Access Policy debate can be better understood through the lenses of competing Intellectual Property theories.
A raft of typos in a new book can break the spell of reading. Copy editing and formatting are not to be taken lightly in written communication.
Controversial journal releases next issue, signals further editorial changes
Publisher asks for submission stop while searching for new editor-in-chief.
The novel is about novelty. Self-publishing is just the latest option for authors. Some argue that it’s reinventing literature.
Wikipedia is a reference that is accurate but incomplete. How does it fare as a drug resource? A recent study finds an interesting trend.
A journal begins requiring authors to submit peer-reviewed pages to Wikipedia. Is this a great idea?
The Research Assessment Exercise is slow and expensive. Abandoning peer-review for quantitative assessment may lead to excessive gaming and corrupt the indicators of quality.
The abuse of editorial power and favoritism leads to a national scandal in France.
Scholarly publishers risk following the newspaper industry if they don’t value peer-review.
Why the market for scholarly articles looks a lot like the market for used cars.
A recent PLoS Medicine article claims that information economics distort science. But maybe it’s an obsession with journals distorting the views of the authors.
Lies inserted into Wikipedia get corrected quickly, a small study finds.
Disintermediation presupposes the intermediation is the only choice. Maybe apomediation is the destination.
Google Knols launched with a lot of splash, but is it a small fish?