Privacy, Google, and the Reading Public
Privacy is something we trade in all the time. The questions are about the best trades to make.
Privacy is something we trade in all the time. The questions are about the best trades to make.
NIH-funded researchers append name to ghost-written textbook. Is it time for physicians to heal themselves?
A recent New York Times Magazine feature plays off fears that the next generation is prone to distraction and underachievement. The facts, and an apparently superior media outlet, argue otherwise.
Improper use of financial analysis can obscure problems in strategy, a problem faced by for-profit and not-for-profit organizations alike.
Speaking is fun and rewarding, but it has its downsides. Time to pause and refresh.
Another scandal rocks medical journal publishing. It’s time to stop pretending journals can salvage this on their own. It’s time to bring modern solutions to bear.
A write-up of a presentation at Charleston, here’s one way to parse trust in academic publishing.
A bone-rattling interview with someone who may haunt the medical literature.
Bob Stein has proposed a taxonomy for social reading, which refers to all the conversations and comments that take place about a book.
If openness is an ideological tenant of science, why are scientists so secretive?
A recent Atlantic article has cast doubt on high-impact medical research. But is the article accurate? Or is it biased itself?
McLuhan posited “the medium is the message.” Is it still? GenY might teach us a thing or two.
Recent inflection points for the music industry may yet again prove instructive for publishers and others. But is it already too late for us to recover the craft of making products rather than providing content?
“Toxie” is a story based on facts, and worth waiting for. Why can’t the news media return to telling it like it is rather than playing to the narrative?
The expenses publishers incur rejecting papers and book proposals are about more than filtering.