The Impact Factor: A Tool from a Bygone Era?
With scientific information propagating in new ways, is the Impact Factor measuring what it was intended to measure?
With scientific information propagating in new ways, is the Impact Factor measuring what it was intended to measure?
Thinking about the Kindle as an e-book reader rather than a wireless reader makes you miss some of the benefits of not owning books.
With an outdated view of information technology, institutional repositories are missing an opportunity to cut costs while they fulfill their missions.
In this video from a U.S. State Department presentation, Clay Shirky explains how the Internet has gone from a “source of information” to a “site of coordination” — the fifth historical revolution in communications.
The Bentham experiment suggests that a poorly managed payment system may be the root of a larger problem emerging in academic publishing.
No new editor, a submission stop, and an announcement to authors to select another journal. As if this weren’t enough, the backlog of unpublished manuscripts is being cleared at an unprecedented rate.
When a group of publishers sits down to discuss social networking, there are many insights to be had.
Two long thoughts after the SSP Annual Meeting — about whether science is truly salvation, and reflecting on why non-expert information can be vital to an accurate scholarly record.
New applications are coming out to help scholars, librarians, and STM publishers reach their missions and audiences. But how do they stack up?
A session with Geoff Bilder recharged some batteries, both actually and metaphorically.
Adam Bly’s keynote exhorts us to embrace a digital future of collaboration and multidisciplinary science. And a few announcements.
The “Now Web” has emerged as a major alternative for users. Google is watching it, and you should be, too.
“The Onion” continues to skewer many things scholarly publishers probably like, including President Obama and “Star Trek.” Join us for a few Friday laughs.
“I have seen the future, and it doesn’t work.” — John Senders, pioneer of the electronic journal
Untangling the functions of curators and docents raises an interesting set of questions for STM publishers — about ownership, value, and the future.