Howard's Pick for 2010: The Tablet Enters the Information Fray
Four days with the iPad became 8 months with it. Meanwhile, friends like the Android tablets joined in.
Four days with the iPad became 8 months with it. Meanwhile, friends like the Android tablets joined in.
Our ease with print makes inertia feel natural. But the winners will have facility with many more information technologies than just paper and ink.
Why hasn’t scientific publishing been disrupted? The question created one of the year’s most-read posts.
The publisher of Harper’s proves himself an anachronist, while O’Reilly scolds other publishers to wake up!
It’s been a reckless year marked by books becoming cannon fodder in the platform wars.
The movement to publish more and more demands that we find ways to preserve the trust we’ve built while taking advantage of the sunlight public availability can provide.
Wikileaks teaches us a number of lessons, the most important being that the world will change, whether we like it or not.
What better way to show how to make a great PowerPoint than with PowerPoint examples?
The false premise of replacement means the future isn’t destructive, just additive.
The self-publishing adventure that began here two years ago winds down. What worked? What didn’t?
Another science blogging network implodes, a sign that the age of exuberance is giving way to the business realities.
The Wikileaks scandal shows that commercial cloud providers aren’t ready for the realities of publishing and information hosting.
A recent New York Times Magazine feature plays off fears that the next generation is prone to distraction and underachievement. The facts, and an apparently superior media outlet, argue otherwise.
Is our future defined by third-party aggregators? Or is there a business opportunity there worth fighting for?
Another scandal rocks medical journal publishing. It’s time to stop pretending journals can salvage this on their own. It’s time to bring modern solutions to bear.