Scientific Impact Measures Compared
A new study suggests that the venerated journal impact factor (JIF) may not provide a consensus view of “scientific impact.”
A new study suggests that the venerated journal impact factor (JIF) may not provide a consensus view of “scientific impact.”
Indexing of proceedings papers, errors in conversion, draw ire from bibliometrics community. Some question its effect on journal Impact Factors.
Italian researchers may have discovered the solution to comparing citation impact across disciplines. Is the Impact Factor next?
Does the Principle of Repeated Improvement Result in Better Journal Impact Estimates than Raw Citation Counts?