Horns of a Dilemma: Open Access or Academic Freedom
Librarians must choose between fiscal irresponsibility and a conflict with academic freedom when establishing open access publication funds.
Librarians must choose between fiscal irresponsibility and a conflict with academic freedom when establishing open access publication funds.
European countries could save millions of Euros if they switched to open access publishing and self-archiving, a report suggests. But is this report based on valid assumptions?
Freely-accessible articles are cited more frequently, but open access is not the cause, a new study reports.
A common systemic problem links oversight of financial risks and author-pays peer-review. Both are potentially calamitous.
In creating a ‘level playing field’ for open access publishers, we put non-profit publishers at a great disadvantage.
With an outdated view of information technology, institutional repositories are missing an opportunity to cut costs while they fulfill their missions.
Will $800 buy you a publication in a Bentham Science journal?
The CPI is an excellent tool for calculating the cost of living but a very bad tool for measuring the purchasing power of libraries.
$50K is more than enough money for an author OA fund claims Cornell Library Board.
Transparency and accountability are at the heart of Open Access. If only library advocates would walk the talk.
New report outlines guidelines for establishing central publication funds. Success of these funds may spell failure for libraries.
Academic freedom cited as main counter-argument.
The NIH Public Access Policy debate can be better understood through the lenses of competing Intellectual Property theories.
We need to shake ourselves from the metaphor of Intellectual Property and create a new way of viewing information.
Revolutionary scientific video journal implements subscription model, cites financial and quality reasons.