Advertising, Books, Metrics and Analytics, Reading

Book Buying Habits — Evolving and Online

Recently, Bowker released book-purchasing and reading habits for 2008, derived from a 60-75 question survey of 36,000 book buyers. The results are shown below in a slideshow. Here are some I found interesting:

  1. Half of Americans bought a book in 2008; 45% of American read a book in 2008.
  2. Most books were purchased by female shoppers.
  3. Seniors are adopting the Kindle the fastest.
  4. The mystery-detective fiction genre is the most popular. Its readers are also the least affluent.
  5. Internet bookstores have surpassed large chain bookstores for book shopping.
  6. Internet ads created awareness for books for 54.1% of respondents.
  7. Online reviews are driving decisions 2x the rate of printed reviews.

If anyone can explain Slide 19 to me, I’d appreciate it.

Overall, an interesting study of the landscape of book shopping and buying habits.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

About Kent Anderson

I am the CEO/Publisher of the Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, Inc. Prior to this, I was an executive at the New England Journal of Medicine. I also was Director of Medical Journals at the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Discussion

6 Responses to “Book Buying Habits — Evolving and Online”

  1. Slide 19 shows the gender split in purchasing across the main genres. Example: Of all units sold in the Mystery/Detective genre, 71% were purchased by women and 29% by men. How valid this is I can’t tell because you don’t know if the women are buying these titles for themselves or for others as gifts.

    Posted by Jill | Jun 12, 2009, 8:10 am
    • Thanks, Jill. I was flipping through this quickly, and every slide parsed immediately, but that one puzzled me at first. Thanks for figuring it out for me!

      Posted by Kent Anderson | Jun 12, 2009, 8:23 am
  2. Slide nineteen breaks down total book sales by gender, not just the number of book buyers. It shows that in all genres except sci-fi, not only are there more women (slide 18), but each female buyer buys more book than the male buyer, in that same genre (women read more books than males).

    So if you had 100 book buyers, 57 of them would be female. If you then had 1,000 books purchased, 650 of them would have been bought by women. Each woman would have purchased 11.4 books, while each man would have purchased only 8.1 books. Were it not for SciFi, the imbalance would no doubt have been much worse. Then again, the heavy imbalance in Romance may account for much of the shift, since a typical Harlequin romance is 1/2 to 1/3 the length of a hard sci-fi book (and definitely is written to a lower grade level and doesn’t require any concentration, both of which lead to faster reading and buying more books).

    Posted by Karen in TN | Jun 16, 2009, 6:56 pm

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: Is Adoption of Ebook Readers Breaking Down by Age? @ e-Book Reader News - Jun 12, 2009

  2. Pingback: Faltering newspapers and such « Ethical Thoughts - Jun 12, 2009

  3. Pingback: 10 Musts for Marketing to Women on Facebook « Curiously Creative - Aug 4, 2010

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Side Dishes by Stewart Wills

Find Posts by Category

Find Posts by Date

June 2009
S M T W T F S
« May   Jul »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

The Scholarly Kitchen on Twitter

SSP_LOGO
The mission of the Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP) is "[t]o advance scholarly publishing and communication, and the professional development of its members through education, collaboration, and networking." SSP established The Scholarly Kitchen blog in February 2008 to keep SSP members and interested parties aware of new developments in publishing.
......................................
The Scholarly Kitchen is a moderated and independent blog. Opinions on The Scholarly Kitchen are those of the authors. They are not necessarily those held by the Society for Scholarly Publishing nor by their respective employers.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 354 other followers