Adventure in Open Access Publishing
Would an Open Access publisher accept a nonsensical paper if the author were willing to pay?
Would an Open Access publisher accept a nonsensical paper if the author were willing to pay?
The notion of a persistent, unique, portable author identifier sounds reasonable, but there may be a showstopper or two hidden in the mix.
The Gazette is going through a transformation in how they envision and create content. Can other publishers and content providers learn something from their approach?
What do authors say when they are caught duplicating text and figures from another paper? More than you’d imagine!
Skittles.com shows how you can quickly and easily leverage Twitter and Facebook for major audience. Can we take a clue?
Amazon’s release of the Kindle for iPhone moves the battle lines from devices to stores. How will iTunes respond?
A raft of typos in a new book can break the spell of reading. Copy editing and formatting are not to be taken lightly in written communication.
Community is a subset of the population. That subset may be self-selected or selected by some external criteria. But, by definition, communities are exclusive groups.
Controversial journal releases next issue, signals further editorial changes
The debate over Open Access is not about science or economics but about core values and the language that embodies them.
The law of unintended consequences states that it’s all unintended. This video documents one chain of events important for all publishers.
Venerable open-access medical journal reinstitutes subscription model. But can it offer enough content to lure customers back?
In the world of online video, Hulu is making everyone else look stiff and arthritic.
The Scholarly Kitchen is one year old today! Read an anniversary entry, then help us celebrate by leaving us a cheery comment!
E-publishing ties content to a platform — one that is often bereft of aesthetics and craft. Is this why digital publishing still leaves people cold?