Funding UK Research
The Research Assessment Exercise is slow and expensive. Abandoning peer-review for quantitative assessment may lead to excessive gaming and corrupt the indicators of quality.
The Research Assessment Exercise is slow and expensive. Abandoning peer-review for quantitative assessment may lead to excessive gaming and corrupt the indicators of quality.
The abuse of editorial power and favoritism leads to a national scandal in France.
Image via CrunchBase Back in May 2008, I wrote about a new publishing venture, 8020 Publishing, and their magazines, Everywhere and JPG. They had an intriguing idea — magazines based on user-submitted (amateur) content. And they had plenty of content, […]
When you have to walk the talk, you end up self-publishing. Can it succeed for a work of fiction?
Has the iPhone put the Kindle in the corner? Or will users be predictably irrational and complicate things for publishers?
Scholarly publishers risk following the newspaper industry if they don’t value peer-review.
The Blackberry Storm looks to be a weak clipper system rather than a hurricane. Meanwhile, the iPhone may be poised to control the weather.
As we shut off the stoves in the Scholarly Kitchen for 2008, we leave you with an inspirational montage of famous film moments.
Sure, the news is a commodity now, but perhaps losing the data is what triggered the beginning of the end for newspapers.
The grim parade of dead magazines — put to music!
YouTube is the #2 search engine in the world. Will digital natives be more video-centric than text-centric?
Improving transparency and accountability in biomedical publishing has turned authorship into a legal system.
Professionalism of science has given face to invisible technicians and collaborators and can partly explain the growth in authorship.
When you wrap your presents, are you also being bombarded by x-rays?
Content from yesteryear no longer works in the modern world. We have to re-imagine.