The Scholarly Kitchen

What’s Hot and Cooking In Scholarly Publishing

  • About
  • Archives
  • Collections
    Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    Collections
    • Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    • Academia
    • Business Models
    • Discovery and Access
    • Diversity and Inclusion
    • Economics
    • Libraries
    • Marketing
    • Metrics and Analytics
    • Open Access
    • Organizational Management
    • Peer Review
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology and Disruption
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow

Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe

What Do Statements of Support for California Tell Us About the Big Deal?

What do statements of support for UC reveal about open access publishing, institutional priorities, and the role of library-publisher contracts?

  • By Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
  • Sep 9, 2019
  • 13 Comments

Articles Summaries that “Spoil” the Paper to Save Reader Time

As there is too little time to read all the papers, Paper Digest automatically lists out the key sentences of a paper.

  • By Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
  • Aug 7, 2019
  • 11 Comments

Diverting Leakage to the Library Subscription Channel

Springer Nature is leading in the effort to preserve library subscriptions by syndicating its content and, in doing so, would establish ResearchGate as perhaps the foremost service for the distribution of scholarly content. Analysis by @lisalibrarian and @rschon.

  • By Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe, Roger C. Schonfeld
  • Jul 16, 2019
  • 15 Comments

Open and Equitable Scholarly Communication: An ACRL Research Agenda

ACRL’s latest report identifies needed areas of research to help foster a more open, inclusive and equitable scholarly communications system.

  • By Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
  • Jun 18, 2019
  • 0 Comments

Will Transformative Agreements Unravel Library Consortia?

Will cost share allocations for transformative agreements threaten the cohesion of library consortia?

  • By Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
  • May 20, 2019
  • 17 Comments

If At First You Don’t Succeed … Make Another Response to Plan S?

cOAlition S rebuffed recommendations for continuing hybrid and supporting sister journals. Springer Nature tries again with concept of the “Transformative Publisher.” Thoughts?

  • By Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
  • May 8, 2019
  • 13 Comments

Transformative Agreements: A Primer

Read-and-publish? Publish-and-read? A primer on transformative agreements by @lisalibrarian.

  • By Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
  • Apr 23, 2019
  • 12 Comments

ACRL 2019: Recasting the Narrative

See what Scholarly Kitchen Chef @lisalibrarian is looking forward to at #acrl2019 and sessions where you can find Scholarly Kitchen Chefs presenting.

  • By Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
  • Apr 9, 2019
  • 1 Comment

Springer Nature Syndicates Content to ResearchGate

A pilot project representing the first significant experiment with the syndication of publisher content to a content supercontinent.

  • By Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
  • Mar 1, 2019
  • 58 Comments

Is Hybrid a Valid Pathway to Open Access? Publishers Argue Yes, in Response to Plan S

As we await the next communication from Coalition S, the largest publishers indicate that they will not abandon the hybrid pathway for open access.

  • By Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
  • Feb 19, 2019
  • 11 Comments
Newer Older

Official Blog of:

Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The Chefs

  • Rick Anderson
  • Todd A Carpenter
  • Michael Clarke
  • Angela Cochran
  • Lettie Y. Conrad
  • David Crotty
  • Phil Davis
  • Joseph Esposito
  • Robert Harington
  • Siân Harris
  • Haseeb Irfanullah
  • Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
  • Phill Jones
  • Scholarly Kitchen
  • Judy Luther
  • Alice Meadows
  • Ann Michael
  • Alison Mudditt
  • Jill O'Neill
  • Charlie Rapple
  • Roger C. Schonfeld
  • David Smith
  • Tao Tao
  • Tim Vines
  • Jasmine Wallace
  • Karin Wulf

Most Recent

  • Ask The Chefs: New Year’s Resolutions
  • Words Matter: A Week Best Expressed through Poetry
  • Guest Post — Citing Software in Scholarly Publishing to Improve Reproducibility, Reuse, and Credit

Recent Tweets

Retweet on TwitterScholarly Kitchen Retweeted
alicejmeadowsAlice Meadows@alicejmeadows·
12h

Interesting mix of professional new year resolutions from the chefs today @TAC_NISO @drs1969 @kawulf @JudyLuther @JfrumdaA - I wonder if @annmichael will check up on us in December!? https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2021/01/25/ask-the-chefs-new-years-resolutions/

Retweet on TwitterScholarly Kitchen Retweeted
cshperspectivesRichard Sever@cshperspectives·
15h

@ScholarlyChickn @Edit0r_At_Large @scholarlykitchn I suspect they don’t because dropping it might simultaneously make things more meaningful and reduce the appeal to authors/adopters. Like the Impact Factor: flawed but also easy...

Retweet on TwitterScholarly Kitchen Retweeted
ScholarlyChicknPhil Davis@ScholarlyChickn·
15h

@Edit0r_At_Large @scholarlykitchn @cshperspectives I've been arguing dropping the #altmetric score from the donut since 2013. Little has changed
https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2013/09/30/visualizing-article-performance-altmetrics-searches-for-appropriate-display/

Follow the Scholarly Kitchen Blog Follow Us
Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The mission of the Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP) is to advance scholarly publishing and communication, and the professional development of its members through education, collaboration, and networking. SSP established The Scholarly Kitchen blog in February 2008 to keep SSP members and interested parties aware of new developments in publishing.

The Scholarly Kitchen is a moderated and independent blog. Opinions on The Scholarly Kitchen are those of the authors. They are not necessarily those held by the Society for Scholarly Publishing nor by their respective employers.

  • About
  • Archives
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Website Credits
ISSN 2690-8085