F1000 Journal Rankings — The Map Is Not the Territory
Does the release of a journal ranking metric signal a change in vision for post-publication peer review?
Does the release of a journal ranking metric signal a change in vision for post-publication peer review?
If the Journal Usage Factor were run like an election, it would be a system where each party runs its own polls, hoards its own votes, provides no paper trail, and has the power to ignore any appeal.
It has become fashionable to rally against the elitism of journals and their editors. An economic argument for why we still need them both.
Rewarding scientists with cash bonuses when they publish in prestigious journals drives up submission rates but has no effect on publication success, a new study reports.
All primary data should be made openly available, a UK government report recommends.
A review of the literature shows that access conditions are getting better, not worse. So, why do we hear just the opposite?
Overburdened by supplemental data, journal limits publication to “essentials” plus non-article formats.
Does the success of the scalable, multidisciplinary open access mega journal signal the imminent demise of the specialized, highly-selective subscription journal?
A new open access journal announced with much fanfare, but with few details, no name and no business plan.
Why predicting a journal’s Impact Factor may be more difficult than you think.
Are author manuscripts in institutional repositories “good enough” for public consumption?
From the archive: an interview of a medical ghostwriter and an inside view of the medical communications industry — both speakers featured at the 2011 SSP Annual Meeting.
Humor about scientific misconduct may reflect a deeper, more serious side of academic culture gone wrong.
At Cornell University, you can rent a bicycle from the circulation desk. Should the library be peddling a different brand?
A massive study of student papers by Turnitin reveals that many are copying text from Wikipedia and other user-generated sites, but it’s not clear in distinguishing text-matches from plagiarism.