The Mismeasure of Man, Funds, and Open Access Experiments
After one year, most COPE funds remain unspent. Is it time to revise the policy?
After one year, most COPE funds remain unspent. Is it time to revise the policy?
Pubget still seems like a technology in search of a problem or a solution in search of a viable business model.
Outdated and arbitrary e-filing policies create lengthy access embargoes to university research.
Post-publication review is spotty, unreliable, and may suffer from cronyism, several studies reveal.
Journals that fail to keep up with background Impact Factor inflation may actually be losing ground.
PLoS ONE’s relatively high impact factor may compromise its ability to support PLoS Biology and PLoS Medicine.
A new study analyzing the citation performance of identical articles in multiple sources provides new insight into the causes of citation. But does it accomplish its goals?
An argument for why conferences should not be recorded and rebroadcast.
In an industry where energy, youth, and innovation are often valued over experience, what can be learned from a panel of wizened members of the publishing industry?
Experimentation and choice are key to finding long-term sustainability.
“Building apps is not all unicorns and rainbows.” Publishers should take a practical, iterative, and collaborative approach to delivering content.
“Scholarly publishing is too important to be monopolized!” Solution to digitization is decentralized commerce.
Reputation — fragile, cumulative, and indirect — is the reward of science. Direct compensation to motivate specific behaviors is a dangerous proposal.
The willingness of industry to sponsor open access articles may bias your access to reliable health information.
Positive research results may indicate that the scientific system is working efficiently.