When Fraud Hits Medical Science: The Decade of the Vaccine-Autism Scandal
Now that the vaccine-autism link has been shown to be based on a fraud, will ego continue to trump humility in the face of evidence?
Now that the vaccine-autism link has been shown to be based on a fraud, will ego continue to trump humility in the face of evidence?
Wikipedia’s 10th anniversary must be acknowledged, and its seismic, worldwide redefinition of the reference work recognized.
It’s time to abandon the library-as-victim narrative and write a new story.
The truth isn’t disintegrating, but perhaps weaker or ad hoc theoretical frameworks are dissolving more quickly these days.
The publisher of Harper’s proves himself an anachronist, while O’Reilly scolds other publishers to wake up!
Should institutional open access repositories be run like journals?
Wikileaks teaches us a number of lessons, the most important being that the world will change, whether we like it or not.
A short video explaining how the list is made.
NIH-funded researchers append name to ghost-written textbook. Is it time for physicians to heal themselves?
Do the benefits of open peer-review outweigh the costs? A BMJ study argues “yes,” but there are caveats.
A new collection of essays in the Journal of Electronic Publishing focuses on various issues facing the university press world today, but perhaps does not consider the possibility of presses taking on a more central role in their parents’ strategy.
Another scandal rocks medical journal publishing. It’s time to stop pretending journals can salvage this on their own. It’s time to bring modern solutions to bear.
EMBO opens up the black box of peer-review. Is it worth the cost?
A write-up of a presentation at Charleston, here’s one way to parse trust in academic publishing.
Want to understand the medical authorship industry? Attend their conference!