The Scholarly Kitchen

What’s Hot and Cooking In Scholarly Publishing

  • About
  • Archives
  • Collections
    Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    Collections
    • Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    • Academia
    • Business Models
    • Discovery and Access
    • Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility
    • Economics
    • Libraries
    • Marketing
    • Mental Health Awareness
    • Metrics and Analytics
    • Open Access
    • Organizational Management
    • Peer Review
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology and Disruption
  • Translations
    topographic world map
    Translations
    • All Translations
    • Chinese
    • German
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Spanish
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow

Archives: Authority

Industry Sponsorship of Open Access Articles

The willingness of industry to sponsor open access articles may bias your access to reliable health information.

  • By Phil Davis
  • May 3, 2010
  • 20 Comments
  • Time To Read: 2 mins

Is OUP’s “Anti-Google” Just a Half-Million Words of Filter Failure?

The OUP has launched Oxford Bibliographies Online, hoping to filter major fields down to a high-quality, peer-reviewed reference kick-start. But does a wordy filter actually filter in the networked world?

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Apr 28, 2010
  • 1 Comment
  • Time To Read: 2 mins

PLoS’ Squandered Opportunity — Their Problems with the Path of Least Resistance

The Public Library of Science was once a radical force, but is now dependent on author-pays bulk-publishing for its livelihood, which introduces all sorts of problems for every journal publisher. What went wrong?

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Apr 27, 2010
  • 100 Comments
  • Time To Read: 6 mins

The Trouble with the Truth: Politics Squelches Science Again

A new NSF report is edited to suppress important facts, denying the truth.

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Apr 13, 2010
  • 10 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Improving Peer Review: Let’s Provide an Ingredients List for Our Readers

We describe many aspects of studies, but “peer reviewed” is a generic label for a multitude of recipes. Maybe we should start listing what went into it.

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Mar 30, 2010
  • 31 Comments
  • Time To Read: 4 mins

Significant But Wrong: Are Open Data Advocates Asking Too Much From Statistics?

A recent article about statistics started a useful discussion in the blogosphere. And I was left wondering: Are open data dreams built on statistical sand?

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Mar 24, 2010
  • 0 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

From Me to You: Selling Books on a Direct Basis

As more books are sold in electronic form, they will increasingly be marketed on a direct-to-consumer basis.

  • By Joseph Esposito
  • Mar 23, 2010
  • 15 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Dan Pink and the Power of Intrinsic Motivation

What motivates us? Do we respond better to carefully constructed reward systems? Or do we just want to be smarter, get smarter, and figure things out on our own?

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Mar 19, 2010
  • 1 Comment
  • Time To Read: < 1 min

Controversial Math Journal Relauches: New Editors, Focus on Rigorous Review

Publisher relaunches journal with new editorial board and scope, and a renewed focus on rigorous review.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Mar 18, 2010
  • 2 Comments
  • Time To Read: 2 mins

Rewriting the History of the Open Access Debate

A new review of the literature about open access’ effects on article citations attempts to rewrite the debate.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Mar 11, 2010
  • 30 Comments
  • Time To Read: 4 mins

How Networked Information Changes the Filter Metaphor for Journals

Image via Wikipedia I think by the end of this post, you won’t think of your editorial filter in quite the way you did when you woke up this morning. The metaphor of a filter has informed our thinking about […]

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Feb 2, 2010
  • 19 Comments
  • Time To Read: 5 mins

Is It Still Disruption When You’ve Done It Yourself?

The fact that scientific publishing hasn’t been disrupted may be a sign of a problem, not an advantage. A future choice may be disruption or irrelevance. Which will we choose?

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Jan 21, 2010
  • 15 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Is Privacy Dead? Only When Exploitation Mixes with Apathy

Recently, pronouncements by online mega-players (Google, Facebook) have been lighting up the boards as Eric Schmidt and Mark Zuckerberg particularly have made incendiary comments about the future and value of privacy. Here’s Eric Schmidt, in a brief clip, saying things […]

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Jan 19, 2010
  • 8 Comments
  • Time To Read: 4 mins

Is Google Making Us Stupid, Part II: Perhaps, If We Don’t Seek Truth Over Information

Is a creeping computerization of our intellects making us less willing to accept that truth and knowledge may begin and end with human beings?

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Jan 14, 2010
  • 9 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Do Medical Editors Discriminate Against Poor Authors?

Do medical editors have different quality standards based on the author’s geographic location?

  • By Phil Davis
  • Dec 18, 2009
  • 2 Comments
  • Time To Read: 2 mins

Posts pagination

Prev 1 … 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 … 53 Next

Search and filter fields can be used in combination to refine results.

Filter By

Official Blog of:

Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The Chefs

  • Rick Anderson
  • Todd A Carpenter
  • Angela Cochran
  • Lettie Y. Conrad
  • David Crotty
  • Joseph Esposito
  • Ashutosh Ghildiyal
  • Roohi Ghosh
  • Robert Harington
  • Haseeb Irfanullah
  • Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
  • Phill Jones
  • Roy Kaufman
  • Scholarly Kitchen
  • Stephanie Lovegrove Hansen
  • Alice Meadows
  • Alison Mudditt
  • Jill O'Neill
  • Charlie Rapple
  • Dianndra Roberts
  • Maryam Sayab
  • Roger C. Schonfeld
  • Avi Staiman
  • Randy Townsend
  • Tim Vines
  • Hong Zhou

Interested in writing for The Scholarly Kitchen? Learn more.

Most Recent

  • Guest Post — Develop to Delegate: How Investing in Early-Career Professionals Strengthens Organizations
  • Guest Post — Quality Over Quantity: Why Scholarly Publishing Needs Stronger Front-End Gatekeeping to Build Trust and Long-Term Value
  • Evidence Isn’t Just for Research

SSP News

SSP Welcomes Newly Elected Board Members for 2026-2027 Term

Apr 28, 2026

Calling all volunteers… Get involved with SSP!

Apr 23, 2026

Celebrating our Community of Volunteers

Apr 20, 2026
Follow the Scholarly Kitchen Blog Follow Us
Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The mission of the Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP) is to advance scholarly publishing and communication, and the professional development of its members through education, collaboration, and networking. SSP established The Scholarly Kitchen blog in February 2008 to keep SSP members and interested parties aware of new developments in publishing.

The Scholarly Kitchen is a moderated and independent blog. Opinions on The Scholarly Kitchen are those of the authors. They are not necessarily those held by the Society for Scholarly Publishing nor by their respective employers.

  • About
  • Archives
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Website Credits
ISSN 2690-8085