The Scholarly Kitchen

What’s Hot and Cooking In Scholarly Publishing

  • About
  • Archives
  • Collections
    Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    Collections
    • Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    • Academia
    • Business Models
    • Discovery and Access
    • Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility
    • Economics
    • Libraries
    • Marketing
    • Mental Health Awareness
    • Metrics and Analytics
    • Open Access
    • Organizational Management
    • Peer Review
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology and Disruption
  • Translations
    topographic world map
    Translations
    • All Translations
    • Chinese
    • German
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Spanish
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow

Archives: Authors

What We Talk About When We Talk About Business Models: A Bestiary of Revenue Streams

Business models for publishers fall into four broad categories, defined by how revenue is generated. Some classes of content lend themselves to one model over another.

  • By Joseph Esposito
  • Feb 14, 2011
  • 18 Comments
  • Time To Read: 7 mins

Scientific Papers Named After Movies and Songs — Variations Abound in Google Scholar

Authors use movies and songs to inspire the titles of their papers, often to unintentionally silly effect.

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Feb 11, 2011
  • 18 Comments
  • Time To Read: 2 mins

Crowdsourcing, Reference Works, and Peer-Review: Some Surprising Connections

A new study suggests that reference works can be created cheaply and effectively through only mildly organized collaborations. Have we been missing a critical contribution of peer-review? Does it suggest that post-publication won’t review won’t be very effective?

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Feb 9, 2011
  • 2 Comments
  • Time To Read: 4 mins

Will Reference Books and Journals Survive? A Debate

A debate at PSP reveals much, especially after it ends.

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Feb 3, 2011
  • 14 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

SOAP Survey Requires Clean Interpretation of Data

Full of experimental biases and important omissions, what can be learned from the Study of Open Access Publishing (SOAP) survey of scientists?

  • By Phil Davis
  • Feb 2, 2011
  • 15 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

The Journal of Universal Rejection, and Suggestions for Improving It

While the JofUR may represent a culmination of many trends in publishing, there’s still room for improvement.

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Jan 28, 2011
  • 9 Comments
  • Time To Read: 2 mins

Darnton, Coppola, and the Impossibility of Free Information

“Free” is an illusion and an insult. All information we want costs money, and we as creators want it to cost money.

  • By Rick Anderson
  • Jan 27, 2011
  • 20 Comments
  • Time To Read: 4 mins

Don't Look Back — Do Scientists Squelch Citations to Justify Claims of Novelty?

A study showing that randomized controlled trials don’t cite much of the preceding literature suggests there’s a problem, but it’s unclear exactly what the problem is.

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Jan 20, 2011
  • 24 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

E-books and Their Containers: A Bestiary of the Evolving Book

Books take the shape of their containers, and the containers in turn shape the kinds of books we create. The new ebook containers have different affordances, which must be studied to develop a successful ebook program.

  • By Joseph Esposito
  • Jan 18, 2011
  • 11 Comments
  • Time To Read: 8 mins

When Fraud Hits Medical Science: The Decade of the Vaccine-Autism Scandal

Now that the vaccine-autism link has been shown to be based on a fraud, will ego continue to trump humility in the face of evidence?

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Jan 17, 2011
  • 10 Comments
  • Time To Read: 5 mins

Nature's Foray Into Full Open Access Journals

When Nature goes head-to-head with PLoS, will non-profit society publishers take the hit?

  • By Phil Davis
  • Jan 13, 2011
  • 33 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Wikipedia Turns 10 — Let's Celebrate It!

Wikipedia’s 10th anniversary must be acknowledged, and its seismic, worldwide redefinition of the reference work recognized.

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Jan 11, 2011
  • 7 Comments
  • Time To Read: < 1 min

Will Your Next Editors Be Cyborgs or Robots?

As new analytical tools emerge, editors can harness them to advance their craft — or find their craft automated out of their hands.

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Jan 6, 2011
  • 5 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

The Decline Effect Postulate Fails to Find Its Theory

The truth isn’t disintegrating, but perhaps weaker or ad hoc theoretical frameworks are dissolving more quickly these days.

  • By Kent Anderson
  • Dec 30, 2010
  • 7 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Michael's Pick for 2010: The Disruption (or Not) of Scientific Publishing

Why hasn’t scientific publishing been disrupted? The question created one of the year’s most-read posts.

  • By Michael Clarke
  • Dec 29, 2010
  • 5 Comments
  • Time To Read: < 1 min

Posts pagination

Prev 1 … 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 … 77 Next

Search and filter fields can be used in combination to refine results.

Filter By

Official Blog of:

Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The Chefs

  • Rick Anderson
  • Todd A Carpenter
  • Angela Cochran
  • Lettie Y. Conrad
  • David Crotty
  • Joseph Esposito
  • Ashutosh Ghildiyal
  • Roohi Ghosh
  • Robert Harington
  • Haseeb Irfanullah
  • Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
  • Phill Jones
  • Roy Kaufman
  • Scholarly Kitchen
  • Stephanie Lovegrove Hansen
  • Alice Meadows
  • Alison Mudditt
  • Jill O'Neill
  • Charlie Rapple
  • Dianndra Roberts
  • Maryam Sayab
  • Roger C. Schonfeld
  • Avi Staiman
  • Randy Townsend
  • Tim Vines
  • Hong Zhou

Interested in writing for The Scholarly Kitchen? Learn more.

Most Recent

  • Evidence Isn’t Just for Research
  • The Opportunities and Perils of Discovery: STM Releases its Trends 2030
  • Academic Publishing in the Age of AI: From Content to Trust

SSP News

Calling all volunteers… Get involved with SSP!

Apr 23, 2026

Celebrating our Community of Volunteers

Apr 20, 2026
Follow the Scholarly Kitchen Blog Follow Us
Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The mission of the Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP) is to advance scholarly publishing and communication, and the professional development of its members through education, collaboration, and networking. SSP established The Scholarly Kitchen blog in February 2008 to keep SSP members and interested parties aware of new developments in publishing.

The Scholarly Kitchen is a moderated and independent blog. Opinions on The Scholarly Kitchen are those of the authors. They are not necessarily those held by the Society for Scholarly Publishing nor by their respective employers.

  • About
  • Archives
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Website Credits
ISSN 2690-8085