Industry Sponsorship of Open Access Articles
The willingness of industry to sponsor open access articles may bias your access to reliable health information.
The willingness of industry to sponsor open access articles may bias your access to reliable health information.
The e-book age is here — infrastructure, readers, storefronts. Publishers should heed the warning signs and stop delaying the inevitable.
Positive research results may indicate that the scientific system is working efficiently.
The Public Library of Science was once a radical force, but is now dependent on author-pays bulk-publishing for its livelihood, which introduces all sorts of problems for every journal publisher. What went wrong?
Creativity transcends technology, even if you’re on a deadline.
In which I argue that Shirky’s point is more about bureaucracies, cultures, and new approaches.
We describe many aspects of studies, but “peer reviewed” is a generic label for a multitude of recipes. Maybe we should start listing what went into it.
When customers get angry, they’ll resort to all sorts of tricks to be heard. Is it wise for a publisher to take a hard line over the inevitable?
Publisher relaunches journal with new editorial board and scope, and a renewed focus on rigorous review.
Let’s put aside all the controversy about open access publishing and come up with an OA plan that will work.
The Scholarly Kitchen is a venue for open dialog. Yet a few open access advocates consistently try to intimidate people in order to squelch discussion.
Interview with Kent Anderson on various issues concerning scholarly publishing and the life of the writer.
A study making the rounds about free e-books and their effect on sales has major flaws, both micro and macro.
Is this a watershed moment for independent publishing?
A recent study points out that science blogs are failing to provide much in the way of community outreach and education to the non-scientist public. Is this really a failure, or is it an unrealistic expectation?