Authors, Books, Business Models, Reading, Technology, Tools, Usability, World of Tomorrow

E-books Get a Leg Up from CrossRef

CrossRef recently published new guidelines for assigning DOIs to books — including reference works — and a revised fee structure for publisher deposits.

The new parameters advise publishers to deposit DOIs at the chapter/entry level. The 2010 pricing structure, which has significantly reduced fees for backfile and intra-ebook content deposits, supports their recommendation. Assuming publishers adopt this direction (Springer already has — see their new SpringerLink platform), these moves may have far-reaching, long-term implications for e-book functioning and interoperability.

CrossRef identifies the following aims:

  • Maximize reference linking among books, journals, and conference proceedings
  • Enhance the discovery, visibility, and usage of book content
  • Enhance the user’s experience through improved functionality
  • Enable the creation of a book citation reporting mechanism which would give book content the visibility, credibility, and metrics that journal content has

There have been many champions of entry-level metadata, some of the more prominent in connection with Reference Universe. Advocates have been acutely aware of the factors limiting e-book functionality, stemming from the absence of coherent e-book tagging and linking standards.  Reference e-books have suffered particularly in environments external to publishers’ own platforms, because these rely on deep-level tagging to enable discovery and use of the of content within.

Assuming that publishers quickly embrace the new book DOI recommendations, multi-disciplinary reference may yet regain its “royal status” (see David Tyckoson’s presentation for Booklist on “The Rise and Fall of Reference“) in the digital information environment — or, at least, to get back to the table as a relevant, high-use player.

Publishers, particularly those who publish journals, have been cognizant of the potential for DOIs in e-book linking.  However, with hundreds of thousands of backfile DOIs at the chapter and entry-level to deposit, Cross Ref’s pricing has been a gating factor — until now.

It’s easy to envision that, in an environment in which patrons have access to dashboards that help them create and manipulate personalized information folios — e.g., ebrary’s new DASH, which stands for “data sharing, fast” — more granular linking will provide a significant boost.  No one wants to add an entire encyclopedia to their folio, but individual articles make a lot of sense.

Are there unanswered questions? Yes, particularly pertaining to links for titles hosted in non-primary aggregations. E-books may be hosted in 10 or more different locations and formats. With collections of hundreds of thousands of hosted titles in their repositories, e-book aggregators may lack the incentivse to embed granular DOIs that link out to publisher sites.

However, this is an assertive move by CrossRef to help make e-book content — including reference — more parsable, interoperable, and linked.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

About Alix Vance

Alexandra (Alix) Vance is Executive Director of GeoScienceWorld. She has been President of Architrave Consulting, Chief Operating Officer at The Center for Education Reform, Executive Director of Reference Publishing at CQ Press, and Vice President of Business Development at Ebook Library. She serves on the Editorial Board of Learned Publishing and has been a member of the Board of Directors of The Society for Scholarly Publishing and author of The Scholarly Kitchen. She is a painter, social worker, and mother of two.

Discussion

7 thoughts on “E-books Get a Leg Up from CrossRef

  1. Linking to the interior of large documents is potentially very important, so this is great news. On a futuristic note, at OSTI we are studying the concept of user defined links. In addition to being an aggregator, OSTI publishes lengthy DOE research reports at http://www.osti.gov/bridge/.

    We call the idea “user anchoring,” or more informally “doc blog” because we envision it being used in science blogging. We have already added a comment feature that lets users comment on any given report.

    The basic idea for doc blog is quite simple. The user navigates to the point in the document they want to share. They execute the anchor command and the system places an anchor at that point, creates a URL for it, and gives the URL to the user. The user can then post or email the URL, to direct others to that part of the document. This is much more efficient that saying “go to paragraph 5 on page 68,” or some such, especially if one wants to talk about several sections at once.

    User anchoring cannot presently be done, as far as we know, but we think it might be feasible for documents in XML format. It would be wonderful if it could be done in HTML or PDF format. If anyone else is working on, or knows about, similar work I would love to hear about it. (dwojick@hughes.net)

    Posted by David Wojick, Ph.D. | Feb 19, 2010, 9:29 am
    • I think this is brilliant. Especially useful for longer documents, but even for shorter documents it will make better use of readers’ time. I have often been frustrated to click on a link only to find that it’s up to me to locate the cited passage. Very cool. It could prove to be the best thing since the ‘permalink’ — and even friend of same.

      Posted by thorn | Feb 19, 2010, 12:07 pm
    • interesting idea, but I’m not sure why you think user-targeted links can’t be done- it can, in javascript/html environments.

      Posted by Eric Hellman | Feb 20, 2010, 3:19 pm
      • Thanks for the info. We have been looking at document formats like PDF, PS, PPT and Word because that is what our present collection of 250k+ report docs is in. I will pass this on to our techies, who understand such things. Has anybody actually done this in Java/html, that you know of?

        Having an html version makes sense to me, but I am just a function person. Some of my proposals make the techies laugh.

        Posted by David Wojick, Ph.D | Feb 21, 2010, 7:44 am
    • David,

      To answer your question about permalinking to XML, yes, you can, and it’s something we’ve been working on for our legal customers. A good example you can check out now is Norman Walsh’s site (norman (dot) walsh (dot) name). Put your cursor at the end of a paragraph on one of his posts and you’ll see a gray paragraph mark. It’s a permalink to that paragraph.

      Posted by Jason Wilson | Feb 22, 2010, 1:11 pm

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: ISO, the Connected Ebook « Informationatorium - Feb 19, 2010

  2. Pingback: Reblogging: E-books Get a Leg Up from CrossRef « Architrave Consulting - Mar 7, 2010

The Scholarly Kitchen on Twitter

Find Posts by Category

Find Posts by Date

February 2010
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28  
SSP_LOGO
The mission of the Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP) is "[t]o advance scholarly publishing and communication, and the professional development of its members through education, collaboration, and networking." SSP established The Scholarly Kitchen blog in February 2008 to keep SSP members and interested parties aware of new developments in publishing.
......................................
The Scholarly Kitchen is a moderated and independent blog. Opinions on The Scholarly Kitchen are those of the authors. They are not necessarily those held by the Society for Scholarly Publishing nor by their respective employers.
%d bloggers like this: