Open Access and Global Participation in Science
Free scientific articles improve scholarship in developing countries. Subscription journals largely responsible.
Free scientific articles improve scholarship in developing countries. Subscription journals largely responsible.
Newspapers are running out of ideas. A litany of desperate measures don’t bode well for a dying industry.
Indexing of proceedings papers, errors in conversion, draw ire from bibliometrics community. Some question its effect on journal Impact Factors.
On a day when Kindle 2.0 is expected the debut, the e-book is just one force reshaping the book of the future.
Publisher asks for submission stop while searching for new editor-in-chief.
Serialized print publishing has a frequency problem eating at its core. Can journal publishers anticipate and adjust?
As publishers move out of the scarcity model, the social economy is where they might thrive. Can they?
Does the settlement of the case between Gatehouse and the New York Times cast any light? Is the commercial model for news aggregation any closer to being settled?
The vast majority of freely-available biomedical articles were published by societies using traditional subscription models, a new study reports.
The novel is about novelty. Self-publishing is just the latest option for authors. Some argue that it’s reinventing literature.
Wikipedia is a reference that is accurate but incomplete. How does it fare as a drug resource? A recent study finds an interesting trend.
What happens when parody is prescient? It becomes a painful reminder of things gone awry. Happy Friday!
In dire economic times, it’s good to see an innovative use of felines.
Authors in developing countries are no more likely to write papers for Open Access journals and are no more likely to cite Open Access articles a new study suggests.
A journal begins requiring authors to submit peer-reviewed pages to Wikipedia. Is this a great idea?