Gladwell & Nielsen: The Fixed Costs of Fixed Ideas
Gladwell tackles Anderson, Nielsen tackles Christensen. Both provide useful insights for publishers today.
Gladwell tackles Anderson, Nielsen tackles Christensen. Both provide useful insights for publishers today.
The journal that sparked a peer-review controversy has resumed publishing its ousted editor’s work.
In creating a ‘level playing field’ for open access publishers, we put non-profit publishers at a great disadvantage.
With scientific information propagating in new ways, is the Impact Factor measuring what it was intended to measure?
With an outdated view of information technology, institutional repositories are missing an opportunity to cut costs while they fulfill their missions.
The claim that all physics articles are deposited in the arXiv is a myth, according to recent study of self-archiving.
Will $800 buy you a publication in a Bentham Science journal?
The Bentham experiment suggests that a poorly managed payment system may be the root of a larger problem emerging in academic publishing.
The amount of attention or concentration a consumer is willing to devote to a resource is a function of the time they have available and the perceived relevance of the resource being consumed.
No new editor, a submission stop, and an announcement to authors to select another journal. As if this weren’t enough, the backlog of unpublished manuscripts is being cleared at an unprecedented rate.
Elsevier deserves blame for publishing “fake” journals. Doctors share some of the blame too. Let’s not view them as victims.
A session with Geoff Bilder recharged some batteries, both actually and metaphorically.
Is the Google generation coming or are they already here? Why does it matter?
Adam Bly’s keynote exhorts us to embrace a digital future of collaboration and multidisciplinary science. And a few announcements.
$50K is more than enough money for an author OA fund claims Cornell Library Board.