The Cat’s in the Bag
In dire economic times, it’s good to see an innovative use of felines.
In dire economic times, it’s good to see an innovative use of felines.
Authors in developing countries are no more likely to write papers for Open Access journals and are no more likely to cite Open Access articles a new study suggests.
A journal begins requiring authors to submit peer-reviewed pages to Wikipedia. Is this a great idea?
The Research Assessment Exercise is slow and expensive. Abandoning peer-review for quantitative assessment may lead to excessive gaming and corrupt the indicators of quality.
The abuse of editorial power and favoritism leads to a national scandal in France.
Is the fate of print pre-ordained, or an outcome of suicidal circulation strategies?
A major label is now getting most of its revenues from digital sources, but the pie is shrinking. Is it? Or is it just showing how inflated the pie was in the era of fixed media?
Social networks drive naughtiness. Should Santa Claus revise his approach?
Do publishers really believe in what they do? Or have they essentially thrown in the towel?
What can be learned about science and publishing from the El Naschie controversy?
Controversial self-publishing editor, El Naschie, to step down in 2009. Professional affiliations cast in doubt.
Happy Thanksgiving, from Sarah Palin and some unpardonable turkeys.
An editor who publishes five of his own articles is the center of a controversy in math publishing.
And apparently, you don’t care about how others do, either.
Two Swiss economists claim that the supposed Open Access citation advantage can be explained by self-selection and recommend authors save their research dollars.