The Secret Life of Retracted Articles
Retracted papers continue to persist on public websites, in institutional repositories and personal libraries years after they are formally retracted. What can be done to help correct the scientific record?
Retracted papers continue to persist on public websites, in institutional repositories and personal libraries years after they are formally retracted. What can be done to help correct the scientific record?
In this “Stick to Your Ribs,” we revisit a post by Joe Esposito about how not-for-profit governance may be a root cause of middling results and blunted strategies.
I’m doing the same thing this weekend I’ve done on the same weekend for over a decade. The video might help you understand why.
An interview with Ivan Oransky — physician, journalist, and co-founder of “Retraction Watch.”
When there’s a lot at stake, peer review still helps to separate the best information from the rest.
The power and identity of Reviewer 3 springs from the shadows to ensnare the unwanted paper. But is it really a powerful spirit? Or just Dad in a mask?
A recent book tells the story of how technology companies — in the guise of advocates of “open” — have gutted content and culture businesses and the creative ranks that depend on them.
The University of Missouri saga has many lessons for publishers of all types. But perhaps the harshest lesson is that we’re in a tough business.
The EU follows in lockstep with the UK, with a statement instead of a mandate. Are the gloves about to come off?
A lurid story of intramural hijinks at the FDA shows how far from mission an organization can drift when it gets its priorities wrong.
The RCUK announces its OA plans, including a six-month embargo. Now, speculation snaps into reality, and we will see if a number of lurking unintended consequences come to pass.
Science policy is often guided by poorly-constructed and highly biased survey results. Shouldn’t we demand more?
Stray thoughts from vacationland. You may see these again.
An interesting video showing one reason why it makes sense for food in an ad to look different from food you’re served.
Fifty-one journals are suspended from the Journal Citation Report for “anomalous citation patterns.” Whether or not you agree with the impact factor, sanctions help maintain the integrity of the scientific publishing enterprise for everyone.