A major factor in determining quality in the peer review process are the reviewers. Without peers providing high-quality reviews, the value-add of the peer review process declines. We started this conversation about what makes a quality peer review within our larger community via Twitter , and came up with a few qualities of good peer reviewers.
We’re off for the week. Enjoy what’s left of your summer.
Welcoming a new Chef in the Kitchen, Haseeb Irfanullah.
We’re off for the US Independence Day holiday. Celebrate with the Staple Singers.
Some thoughts about using social media in a more intentional and humane manner, and video presentation by Dan Harvey on why outrage and anger are so prevalent (and valuable) online.
We’re off for the US and UK holiday and this week’s SSP Meeting. A musical interlude to move you into summer…
SSP’s Annual Meeting is upon us soon. What goes into putting together a scholarly communications conference?
The scholarly communications marketplace has become increasingly difficult for the smaller independent and the society publisher. Here we preview our upcoming webinar looking at the future for these publishers.
We all have our individual approaches to work. Here, author Roald Dahl offers a tour of his process and his backyard writing hut.
A look back at the last year in The Scholarly Kitchen.
Meet our newest Chef, Jasmine Wallace.
Continuing our efforts to benefit from this year’s reader survey, today we share some stratified analysis by gender, race/ethnicity, and age and an update on efforts to diversify our contributors and perspectives.
The deadline for proposing sessions for next year’s SSP Meeting is approaching. Get your ideas in this week!
The Scholarly Kitchen is hitting the road. Information on our upcoming meeting panels and webinar is provided.
We’re off for the long (US) holiday weekend. Posts to resume Tuesday.