The $1 Billion Apomediation
UAL loses $1 billion in value, thanks to the power of apomediation combined with a mess in the metadata.
UAL loses $1 billion in value, thanks to the power of apomediation combined with a mess in the metadata.
Lies inserted into Wikipedia get corrected quickly, a small study finds.
A new paper describes why early papers get big returns on citations. Fortunately, it is not a case of winner-takes-all.
Project COUNTER releases its third Code of Practice for the counting and reporting of usage data. Is COUNTER also promoting overconfidence in its products?
The SSP TMR has closed, but much of the meeting was captured. Here’s your guide, and insights on why the meeting will evolve next year.
A new study suggests that the open access citation advantage is small and diminishing with time.
Research on Internet chain-letters reveals that information may not spread like diseases
Does your browsing history reveal your gender? Take this quick test to find out.
Position in a daily arXiv email report can determine future citations. A German physicist struggles to determine why.
Scholarly publishers have traditionally focused on articles, issues, subscriptions, citations, impact factors, and business models. But maybe by focusing on these things, which are much more about us than about our readers (who are becoming users today, a significant shift […]
In the best-designed study of this topic yet, no citation advantage emerges for OA articles.
With an index now of 1 trillion URLs, Google is poised to dominate search. But will Cuil throw a wrench in the works?
A paper examines faulty citations, but the authors are on shaky ground.
Does the Principle of Repeated Improvement Result in Better Journal Impact Estimates than Raw Citation Counts?
Online availability of articles may shorten citation window, lead to fewer articles being cited new research suggests.