“Did You Know?” 4.0 — Convergence and Communications
Another “Did You Know?” video has appeared, this time talking about convergence. Maybe it also shows that with each video, we’re closer to the future that once astounded us.
Another “Did You Know?” video has appeared, this time talking about convergence. Maybe it also shows that with each video, we’re closer to the future that once astounded us.
Image via Wikipedia Jim Spanfeller, who is leaving his role of CEO of Forbes.com, recently wrote a provocative piece about online advertising entitled, “Publishers Are Killing Web Advertising’s Potential With Misguided Pricing.” His compelling complaints have to do with publishers […]
Unethical republication has created a unique opportunity to study the effect of journals on article citations.
A debate about scale touches on how two players are also ramping up their presence, and how that might topple the status quo.
The Pubget search engine delivers search results along with PDFs. Should we view this new service as a time-saver for readers or as a threat to publishers?
Manipulating online rating systems may be more common than you think. Journals promoting highly-downloaded and rated articles should take note.
A study of social citation reveals diversion, invention, and distortion, and provides a cautionary tale about how socialization of knowledge in medicine can have downsides.
When it comes to downloads and citations, position in the arXiv matters, a new study finds.
How much work is it to run a blog? After 18 months, I think I finally have enough experience to share some insights.
Free scientific journal access programs claims to boost article output in developing countries. A deeper analysis of the data shows otherwise.
European countries could save millions of Euros if they switched to open access publishing and self-archiving, a report suggests. But is this report based on valid assumptions?
When a teenager is allowed to publish a report under the name of Morgan Stanley, the results show that an important gate-keeping function failed.
Freely-accessible articles are cited more frequently, but open access is not the cause, a new study reports.
With scientific information propagating in new ways, is the Impact Factor measuring what it was intended to measure?
Hubspot’s new report on the Twittersphere looks grim at first glance. But, with some normal Web wisdom in hand, a second look proves fruitful.