The Scholarly Kitchen

What’s Hot and Cooking In Scholarly Publishing

  • About
  • Archives
  • Collections
    Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    Collections
    • Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    • Academia
    • Business Models
    • Discovery and Access
    • Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility
    • Economics
    • Libraries
    • Marketing
    • Mental Health Awareness
    • Metrics and Analytics
    • Open Access
    • Organizational Management
    • Peer Review
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology and Disruption
  • Translations
    topographic world map
    Translations
    • All Translations
    • Chinese
    • German
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Spanish
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow

Archives: Peer Review

Scholarly Publishing: The Elephant (And Other Wildlife) In The Room

Journal-based scholarly communication needs a structural change

  • By Haseeb Irfanullah
  • Oct 24, 2024
  • 8 Comments
  • Time To Read: 7 mins

Guest Post — Upholding the Integrity of Open Science

As preprints become an increasingly integral part of scholarly communication, can automated screening tools improve their reliability and preprint servers’ operational efficiency?

  • By Krishna Kumar Venkitachalam
  • Oct 23, 2024
  • 2 Comments
  • Time To Read: 5 mins

Guest Post — Overcoming Skepticism Through Experimentation: The Role of AI in Transforming Peer Review

AI offers great potential, but also raises significant concerns when it comes to its use in peer review. Experimentation with AI is needed to find the right role for it in the process.

  • By Krishna Kumar Venkitachalam
  • Oct 9, 2024
  • 2 Comments
  • Time To Read: 4 mins

Guest Post: Behind Every Paper is a Person – Reviewer Comments Matter

IOP Publishing offers a short video that draws attention to the importance of professional and constructive peer reviews.

  • By Laura Feetham-Walker
  • Sep 27, 2024
  • 0 Comments
  • Time To Read: < 1 min

Embracing Innovation: Insights from Peer Review Leaders on Managing Technological Change

The real challenge in implementing new peer review technologies lies in managing the human and organizational changes required to make these innovations stick. Three experts share their insights into how they are leading their teams through these transformative processes.

  • By Jasmine Wallace, Laurie Webby, Alison Denby, Erika Mann
  • Sep 27, 2024
  • 0 Comments
  • Time To Read: 8 mins

Innovation and Technology in Peer Review: Some User Perspectives

In today’s Peer Review Week post we hear perspectives on innovation and technology in peer review from a diverse group of users from different countries and disciplines.

  • By Alice Meadows, Leo Anthony Celi, Kaushik Madapati, Grace Pold, Nora Slonimsky, Ivone Cabral, Joshua Piker, Sophie Reisz, Heidi Koch-Bubel, Michael Roy, Michael Willis
  • Sep 26, 2024
  • 0 Comments
  • Time To Read: 9 mins

Guest Post — From Bottleneck to Breakthrough: AI’s Role in the Future of Peer Review

Peer review needs reform. AI systems can act as assistants, providing valuable feedback for both reviewers and editors.

  • By Zeger Karssen
  • Sep 25, 2024
  • 0 Comments
  • Time To Read: 4 mins

Guest Post — Is AI the Answer to Peer Review Problems, or the Problem Itself?

Are there ways to use AI in the research workflow to speed up the peer review process — and, while we’re at it, to address some of the other problems around bias and quality?

  • By Christopher Leonard
  • Sep 24, 2024
  • 5 Comments
  • Time To Read: 7 mins

Some Thoughts on the Promise and Pitfalls of Innovation and Technology in Peer Review 

Today Alice Meadows, Jasmine Wallace, and Karin Wulf officially kick off a week of posts to celebrate Peer Review Week 2024 on the Kitchen with their thoughts on the promise and pitfalls of innovation and technology in peer review

  • By Alice Meadows, Jasmine Wallace, Karin Wulf
  • Sep 23, 2024
  • 1 Comment
  • Time To Read: 7 mins

Peer Review Week 2024: Ask the Chefs

Leading into Peer Review Week 2024, we ask the Chefs: What is, or would be, the most valuable innovation in peer review for your community?

  • By Alice Meadows, Avi Staiman, Hong Zhou, Karin Wulf, Tim Vines, Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe, Haseeb Irfanullah
  • Sep 20, 2024
  • 3 Comments
  • Time To Read: 10 mins

Ask the Community — Thoughts on a Class Action Lawsuit Brought Against Scholarly Publishers

Antitrust litigation has been filed against six major scholarly publishers. We reached out to the community for their thoughts.

  • By David Crotty, Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe, Sven Fund, Sami Benchekroun, Rick Anderson, Matt Hodgkinson, A.J. Boston, Alison Mudditt
  • Sep 18, 2024
  • 12 Comments
  • Time To Read: 14 mins

Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats: A Comprehensive SWOT Analysis of AI and Human Expertise in Peer Review

AI-generated content has been discovered in prominent journals. Should peer reviewers be expected to find AI text in manuscripts? Where in the publication workflow should these checks be done?

  • By Roohi Ghosh
  • Sep 12, 2024
  • 7 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Guest Post — New Directions Seminar: Reverse Roundtables Kept the Post-Lunch Conversations Going!

What are the new directions in scholarly publishing? Check out the unique “reverse roundtable” discussions at SSP’s New Directions seminar!

  • By Matt Cannon, Heather Staines, Jordan Schilling
  • Jul 23, 2024
  • 0 Comments
  • Time To Read: 5 mins

Peer Review Week 2024: “Innovation and Technology in Peer Review”

We’re delighted to reveal the eagerly awaited theme for this year’s Peer Review Week, Innovation and Technology in Peer Review.

  • By Roohi Ghosh, Maria Machado, Gareth Dyke, Maryam Sayab
  • May 29, 2024
  • 1 Comment
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Guest Post: The STM Integrity Hub — Connecting the Dots in a Dynamic Landscape

An update on progress from the STM Research Integrity Hub.

  • By Joris van Rossum
  • May 23, 2024
  • 4 Comments
  • Time To Read: 6 mins

Posts pagination

Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 … 44 Next

Search and filter fields can be used in combination to refine results.

Filter By

Official Blog of:

Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The Chefs

  • Rick Anderson
  • Todd A Carpenter
  • Angela Cochran
  • Lettie Y. Conrad
  • David Crotty
  • Joseph Esposito
  • Roohi Ghosh
  • Robert Harington
  • Haseeb Irfanullah
  • Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
  • Phill Jones
  • Roy Kaufman
  • Scholarly Kitchen
  • Stephanie Lovegrove Hansen
  • Alice Meadows
  • Alison Mudditt
  • Jill O'Neill
  • Charlie Rapple
  • Dianndra Roberts
  • Maryam Sayab
  • Roger C. Schonfeld
  • Avi Staiman
  • Randy Townsend
  • Tim Vines
  • Hong Zhou

Interested in writing for The Scholarly Kitchen? Learn more.

Most Recent

  • Standing Up, Standing Proud, Standing Together: Inside the Pathways to Inclusive Publishing Summit and the Movement for Equity in Scholarly Publishing: Part 1
  • What AI Asks of Open Access
  • Guest Post — Senior Librarians as Publisher Change Agents: What’s the Business Case? (Part 2)

SSP News

Webinar Preview | How AI Is Transforming Research: From Idea to Impact

Mar 30, 2026

2026–2027 SSP Board of Directors Election Open

Mar 18, 2026

President’s Letter | March 2026

Mar 18, 2026
Follow the Scholarly Kitchen Blog Follow Us
Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The mission of the Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP) is to advance scholarly publishing and communication, and the professional development of its members through education, collaboration, and networking. SSP established The Scholarly Kitchen blog in February 2008 to keep SSP members and interested parties aware of new developments in publishing.

The Scholarly Kitchen is a moderated and independent blog. Opinions on The Scholarly Kitchen are those of the authors. They are not necessarily those held by the Society for Scholarly Publishing nor by their respective employers.

  • About
  • Archives
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Website Credits
ISSN 2690-8085