Are Peer-Reviewers Overloaded? Or Are Their Incentives Misaligned?
Improving participation in peer-review may be a matter of finding the right combination of incentives.
Improving participation in peer-review may be a matter of finding the right combination of incentives.
What happens when a proposed solution for a problem becomes an end unto itself? Is peer review really more important than research itself?
It has never been easier to post a comment to a scientific article. Just don’t expect an adequate reply from the author — or one at all — according to a new study.
Social media takes a leap among older adults. Is it because they were once young Internet adopters?
Nonprofit organizations are being asked to measure their social impact. Can they respond to these new challenges?
A set of findings confirm rather than surprise, but apparently some publishers are still behaving as if they’ll be surprised.
Is the Web making experts more susceptible to challenge? Is this a good thing for society as a whole? Or is it creating a confusion demagogues can exploit?
CAPTCHA is viewed as a technology solution to bolster access controls. But by involving humans as solvers, it’s been opened up to a labor market solution.
Like ice-cream and murder, there is no causal relationship between reference length and citations. Now go tell Nature.
An article’s authors and a journal’s editor are surprised when a puff-piece backfires. Thanks for the pretentious seriousness, blogosphere.
A town in the UK abandons traffic lights, to surprising effect.
When brands, credibility, and trust all stumble, what is an increasingly weary public supposed to think?
The I Write Like site was the hot trend recently — but what of Scholarly Kitchen authors? An analysis tells you who we write like, among other things.
The New York Times wants federal regulation of Google’s editorial objectivity.
The cognitive surplus of our age is being unleashed. This video discusses some of the side-effects and trends that will shape our futures.