David's Pick for 2010: Peer Review May Be Old and Imperfect, But It Still Works
After wondering at the supposed burden of peer-review, more evidence emerged that it still works well, and is probably less taxing than other alternatives.
After wondering at the supposed burden of peer-review, more evidence emerged that it still works well, and is probably less taxing than other alternatives.
The movement to publish more and more demands that we find ways to preserve the trust we’ve built while taking advantage of the sunlight public availability can provide.
The data-mining of the Google books database has great promise, but who owns the data-mining rights?
Is the growth of open access journals a sign of market success or dysfunction? Two new studies analyze the data and come to opposite conclusions.
Another science blogging network implodes, a sign that the age of exuberance is giving way to the business realities.
Sensors are being applied to mobile phones, which will launch a new suite of publishing opportunities. By aggregating and interpreting the data uploaded from these mobile sensors, publishers can create new services and open up new markets.
If submission fees result in a more sustainable business model, why are open access publishers opposed to the idea?
NIH-funded researchers append name to ghost-written textbook. Is it time for physicians to heal themselves?
A recent New York Times Magazine feature plays off fears that the next generation is prone to distraction and underachievement. The facts, and an apparently superior media outlet, argue otherwise.
Do the benefits of open peer-review outweigh the costs? A BMJ study argues “yes,” but there are caveats.
Is our future defined by third-party aggregators? Or is there a business opportunity there worth fighting for?
A new collection of essays in the Journal of Electronic Publishing focuses on various issues facing the university press world today, but perhaps does not consider the possibility of presses taking on a more central role in their parents’ strategy.
Mary Meeker sums up 2010 in this slideshow, and invites us to ponder yet again what kind of ride we’re in for.
Harry Potter may be a magician, but Daniel Radcliffe is more of a scientific sort.
The sale of e-books over the Internet will lead to a restructuring of the book business and the evolution of truly global publishers.