The Scholarly Kitchen

What’s Hot and Cooking In Scholarly Publishing

  • About
  • Archives
  • Collections
    Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    Collections
    • Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    • Academia
    • Business Models
    • Discovery and Access
    • Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility
    • Economics
    • Libraries
    • Marketing
    • Mental Health Awareness
    • Metrics and Analytics
    • Open Access
    • Organizational Management
    • Peer Review
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology and Disruption
  • Translations
    topographic world map
    Translations
    • All Translations
    • Chinese
    • German
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Spanish
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow

Archives

Guest Post — Manifesto Time: Do You Need a Publishing Manifesto?

Does your publishing organization need a manifesto? Writing a manifesto for your organization can be a great exercise for team building and planning, and a way to ignite action.

  • By John W. Warren
  • Oct 6, 2025
  • 4 Comments
  • Time To Read: 8 mins

Guest Post — When Significance Hurts: What the SAMPL Guidelines Can Teach Us

If science is to be both honest and healthy, we must accept that statistically non-significant results are part of reality. The SAMPL guidelines, if adopted widely by scholarly publishers and journal editors, hold a solution for authors who worry their results are not “significant.”

  • By Michal Ordak
  • Oct 2, 2025
  • 1 Comment
  • Time To Read: 5 mins

Guest Post – Taxonomy of Delegation: How GAIDeT Reframes AI Transparency in Science, an Interview with Yana Suchikova

Today, we speak with Prof. Yana Suchikova about GAIDeT, the Generative AI Delegation Taxonomy, which enables researchers to disclose the use of generative AI in an honest and transparent way.

  • By Frances Pinter, Yana Suchikova
  • Sep 30, 2025
  • 8 Comments
  • Time To Read: 7 mins

Guest Post – How the AI Debate Has Changed in Just a Few Short Years

Tony Alves reflects on the 2025 Peer Review Congress and the rapid evolution of discussions about AI and peer review since 2022.

  • By Tony Alves
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • 2 Comments
  • Time To Read: 5 mins

Guest Post: Classifying AI Use in Manuscript Preparation – A Recommendation

The STM Association offers a classification scheme for the various possible uses of AI, including GenAI, in the preparation of manuscripts.

  • By Henning Schoenenberger, Kiera McNeice, Joris van Rossum
  • Sep 23, 2025
  • 2 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

Guest Post — May the AI Be With Science

AI has opened a new chapter in the saga of science and peer review. Today, guest author Prof. Nihar B. Shah explains how, if guided with integrity, AI can open galaxies of possibilities.

  • By Nihar B. Shah
  • Sep 19, 2025
  • 2 Comments
  • Time To Read: 6 mins

Guest Post — Is It Enough to Say a Journal Is ‘Peer Reviewed’? The Case for Rating Journals Based on Peer Review Quality

Peer Review Quality Ratings could offer a powerful step toward restoring faith in the scholarly research system, highlight exemplary practices, and ensure that robust, verified science continues to illuminate the path forward for humanity.

  • By Ashutosh Ghildiyal, Gareth Dyke
  • Sep 16, 2025
  • 4 Comments
  • Time To Read: 6 mins

Guest Post – Where Do We All Fit In? Reflections on Belonging, Purpose, and Progress in Scholarly Publishing

Today’s guest post by Deja Forte declares: Publishing isn’t just about systems and standards; it’s about people. Each of us has the power to build bridges between knowledge and the lives it’s meant to benefit.

  • By Deja Forte
  • Sep 10, 2025
  • 11 Comments
  • Time To Read: 5 mins

Guest Post – Code Plagiarism and AI Create New Challenges for Publishing Integrity

This post explores author, reviewer, and publisher ethics and responsibilities related to the use of AI in coding and publishing research software.

  • By Daniel S. Katz, Mohammad Hosseini, Scott C. Edmunds
  • Aug 28, 2025
  • 3 Comments
  • Time To Read: 6 mins

Guest Post – Beyond Open Access, Part II: Make Images Truly Accessible for All

Today’s guest authors offer practical tips for publishing high-quality image descriptions, a key step toward ensuring genuine accessibility in scholarly communications.

  • By Amanda Rogers, Lou Peck, Simon Holt, Carsten Borchert, Beth Richard
  • Aug 27, 2025
  • 3 Comments
  • Time To Read: 8 mins

From Detection to Disclosure — Key Takeaways on AI Ethics from COPE’s Forum

Summing up the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Forum discussion on Emerging AI Dilemmas in Scholarly Publishing, which explored the many challenges AI presents for the scholarly community.

  • By Hong Zhou, Marie Soulière
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • 2 Comments
  • Time To Read: 8 mins

Rise of the Machine Readers: What They Really Want to Read

As AI becomes a major consumer of research, scholarly publishing must evolve: from PDFs for people to structured, high-quality data for machines.

  • By Tim Vines
  • Aug 21, 2025
  • 10 Comments
  • Time To Read: 3 mins

2025 Update: Quantifying Consolidation in the Scholarly Journals Market

Catching up with the ongoing consolidation of the journals market — what has happened in the two years since this was last examined? And how does the market look if you add in a large number of relatively newly launched journals?

  • By David Crotty
  • Aug 20, 2025
  • 1 Comment
  • Time To Read: 7 mins

Guest Post — Beyond Open Access, Part 1: Make Academic Content Truly Accessible for All

Open access has revolutionized how research reaches readers — yet, true accessibility is an ethical imperative for institutions, publishers, and service providers to create genuinely inclusive scholarly communication.

  • By Amanda Rogers, Beth Richard, Carsten Borchert, Lou Peck, Simon Holt
  • Aug 19, 2025
  • 3 Comments
  • Time To Read: 5 mins

INFIDEO Friday: How AI is Changing Our Search Experiences

What happens when AI-infused information systems increasingly provide answers rather than directing people to sources?

  • By Lettie Y. Conrad
  • Aug 15, 2025
  • 1 Comment
  • Time To Read: < 1 min

Posts pagination

Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 33 Next

Official Blog of:

Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The Chefs

  • Rick Anderson
  • Todd A Carpenter
  • Angela Cochran
  • Lettie Y. Conrad
  • David Crotty
  • Joseph Esposito
  • Ashutosh Ghildiyal
  • Roohi Ghosh
  • Robert Harington
  • Haseeb Irfanullah
  • Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
  • Phill Jones
  • Roy Kaufman
  • Scholarly Kitchen
  • Stephanie Lovegrove Hansen
  • Alice Meadows
  • Alison Mudditt
  • Jill O'Neill
  • Charlie Rapple
  • Dianndra Roberts
  • Maryam Sayab
  • Roger C. Schonfeld
  • Avi Staiman
  • Randy Townsend
  • Tim Vines
  • Hong Zhou

Interested in writing for The Scholarly Kitchen? Learn more.

Most Recent

  • Guest Post — Exploring Data Spaces in Scholarly Communications
  • Guest Post — Call to Action: Shaping Our Collective Voice Through Advocacy
  • The Journal Article Is Not the Job

SSP News

Get Your Tickets to the EPIC Awards!

Apr 9, 2026

Bring Your Creativity to Chula Vista: The 3rd Annual SSP Originals Auction

Apr 8, 2026

Annual Meeting Early Registration is Open—Download the Preliminary Program now!

Apr 8, 2026
Follow the Scholarly Kitchen Blog Follow Us
Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The mission of the Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP) is to advance scholarly publishing and communication, and the professional development of its members through education, collaboration, and networking. SSP established The Scholarly Kitchen blog in February 2008 to keep SSP members and interested parties aware of new developments in publishing.

The Scholarly Kitchen is a moderated and independent blog. Opinions on The Scholarly Kitchen are those of the authors. They are not necessarily those held by the Society for Scholarly Publishing nor by their respective employers.

  • About
  • Archives
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Website Credits
ISSN 2690-8085