The Scholarly Kitchen

What’s Hot and Cooking In Scholarly Publishing

  • About
  • Archives
  • Collections
    Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    Collections
    • Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    • Academia
    • Business Models
    • Discovery and Access
    • Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility
    • Economics
    • Libraries
    • Marketing
    • Mental Health Awareness
    • Metrics and Analytics
    • Open Access
    • Organizational Management
    • Peer Review
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology and Disruption
  • Translations
    topographic world map
    Translations
    • All Translations
    • Chinese
    • German
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Spanish
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow

Guest Post — Call for Feedback: STM Task & Finish Group (TFG) Image-type Taxonomy for Alt Text

  • By Lorna Notsch, Beth Richard
  • Jan 30, 2026
  • 2 Comments
  • Time To Read: 4 mins
  • Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility
  • Infrastructure
  • Reading
  • Research
  • Technology
  • User Experience
Share
0 Shares

Editor’s note: Today’s post is by Lorna Notsch and Beth Richard. Lorna is Senior Digital Accessibility Specialist at Sage. Beth is Product Manager for Content Accessibility at Elsevier. 

The STM Association Alt Text Task & Finish Group (TFG) is excited to share its draft image-type taxonomy for scholarly images for comment and feedback. This taxonomy is a collaborative effort by members of the STM Association to develop a comprehensive classification system for images in scholarly publishing. In part, it is intended to assist authors and publishers in meeting the upcoming update to Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), going into effect April 24, 2026, and other global legislation. It also contributes to the industry effort to ensure journal content is as accessible and available to as broad an audience as possible. The following is an example from Creative Commons:

Child reaching for the stars.
Image used under CC BY-SA license from opensource.com

Alt text: Child reaching for the stars.

Image descriptions are an essential feature of accessible publishing, providing a text-based alternative to visual content for users of assistive technology, such as screen readers, as well as for those who may have limited internet bandwidth. Comprehensive descriptions help ensure that everyone can read scholarly communications equitably. They are also required to meet accessibility standards, such as the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), and the legislation based upon them. The ADA Title II update will apply to journal publishers and the images they produce from April 2026.

Key to writing a meaningful image description is the image type: The alt text for a chart differs from that for a relational diagram, medical image, or a photograph, and between subcategories with these: bar, line, pie, etc. Considering the myriad image types that come up in scholarly writing, identifying the image type and how to write alt text for such an image is an important first step. This post introduces a draft image-type taxonomy for scholarly images that is intended as a resource for authors and publishers, and a call for feedback from the scholarly community. Neither this document nor its content has any legal status, and neither is intended as legal advice.

Introducing the image-type taxonomy

The STM Alt Text TFG began in early 2025 as an initiative by the STM Association’s STeC (Standards & Technology) Committee, and currently has 18 members from across European, UK, and US scholarly publishers. Members have met monthly to develop the image-type taxonomy, and the resulting draft product combines input from journal experts as well as accessibility specialists.

Arranged in a hierarchy with 15 top-level categories, the goal of this taxonomy “is to establish a controlled vocabulary of image categories commonly used in scientific and scholarly publishing to assist publishers in providing self-serve guidance and examples to authors to assist them in writing alternative (alt) text for images they submit to books and journals.” Each of the 15 categories features a high-level description of the category, guidance for writing alternative text for the category, a representative image with sample alt text, and a list of any subcategories. It is hoped that, in time, a library of samples will be available for not only primary categories but subcategories as well.

Example From the Taxonomy

The following is an excerpt from Category 11 of the taxonomy, including the first of 15 subcategories.

Category 11: Relational Diagram

Shows connections between parts.

Related term: Concept diagram

Guidance for writing alt text

Name the type of diagram and identify the key entities with a description of how they are connected.

Example (11.2 Flowchart)

From: Jasna Jankovic/Jürgen Stumper (2023). Introduction. In: Jasna Jankovic/Jürgen Stumper (eds.). PEM Fuel Cells. Characterization and Modeling. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2. Courtesy of the authors.

Flow chart with 4 boxes reading left-to-right, “Process”, “Structure”, “Properties”, and “Performance”; between each of them, two arrows (bidirectional) and the term “Model”.

Caption: Schematic illustration of a Process-Structure-Property-Performance (PSPP) approach for fuel cell component design. Using models/correlations (i) performance can be predicted based on stack component physico-chemical properties or (ii) performance targets can be cascaded down into requirements for physico-chemical properties and further to parameters for the structure and manufacturing process.

Alt text: Flow chart with 4 boxes reading left-to-right, “Process”, “Structure”, “Properties”, and “Performance”; between each of them, two arrows (bidirectional) and the term “Model”.

Subcategories of Relational Diagram

11.1     Dendrogram

A tree-like diagram, often used to show taxonomic relationships.

Call for Community Feedback

To develop truly inclusive solutions for accessible publishing, it is essential that a wide range of organizations have input into industry tools. The STM TFG therefore welcomes feedback on the draft taxonomy. This draft taxonomy can be found on the Alt-Text Task & Finish Group page. It is also linked from the STM announcement, which includes a link to a feedback form incorporating this set of questions to consider while reviewing the document that has been created.

  1. To what extent do you think this taxonomy will be helpful for authors in writing alt text for images submitted to books and journals?
  2. To what extent do you find the taxonomy’s hierarchical structure (top-level categories with subcategories) clear and easy to navigate?
  3. Are there any aspects of the taxonomy that seem overly complex or difficult to understand?
  4. Are there any types of scholarly images not covered by the taxonomy (as a top-level or subcategory)?
  5. Is the guidance for writing alt text for each category helpful and actionable?
  6. Do you find the inclusion of example images with alt text examples useful for understanding the taxonomy?
  7. Are there any areas where you feel the taxonomy could be improved (e.g., structure, content, or usability) or expanded?
  8. Are there any additional resources or tools that would help improve the utility of the taxonomy?
  9. Do you have any other comments or feedback that you would like to share?

The comment period is open until February 28, 2026. Following that, the STM Alt Text TFG will review and synthesize the comments and refine and update the taxonomy. We look forward to receiving your feedback before the taxonomy is made available to the wider community.

Share
0 Shares
Share
0 Shares
Lorna Notsch

Lorna Notsch

Lorna Notsch is a Senior Digital Accessibility Specialist at Sage, a global academic publisher. She has worked in digital accessibility since 2013 and is an IAAP Certified Professional in Web Accessibility, as well as a U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Trusted Tester. Lorna has presented and co-presented at multiple conferences, including Accessing Higher Ground, one of the premier conferences on accessibility. She writes regularly on accessibility for her department’s monthly newsletter and conducts training on accessible digital practices for teams and departments at Sage. Lorna has a Master’s degree in Writing and Publishing from Emerson College and has worked in educational publishing her entire career.

View All Posts by Lorna Notsch
Beth Richard

Beth Richard

Beth Richard is Product Manager for Content Accessibility at Elsevier. She has 13 years’ experience in scholarly journal and book production. Beth completed a Master’s degree in Publishing Studies at Oxford Brookes University in 2024/25, for which her dissertation was awarded the Taylor & Francis Prize and the Oxford International Centre for Publishing Award. Her study on the use of alternative (alt) text in academic publications was published in the journal Logos: ‘Key Issues Affecting the Inclusion of Alt Text in Scholarly PDF Publications’.

View All Posts by Beth Richard

Discussion

2 Thoughts on "Guest Post — Call for Feedback: STM Task & Finish Group (TFG) Image-type Taxonomy for Alt Text"

Thank you, Lorna and Beth. Feedback-wise, this does feel like a valuable initiative. Such a taxonomy can also help situate GenAI describers to make their alt-text first drafts better quality because they are better aware of the context of an image. To make this more inclusive of AHSS publishers, this resource put together a few years ago to help with humanies book accessibility may suggest some other high level categories of image: https://share.google/cYPEpxSvrZe44YzGL

  • By Charles Watkinson
  • Jan 30, 2026, 7:46 AM
  • Reply to Comment

Thanks Charles, we will be sure to pass on this humanities resource to the STM group.

  • By Beth Richard
  • Jan 30, 2026, 9:13 AM
  • Reply to Comment

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Official Blog of:

Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The Chefs

  • Rick Anderson
  • Todd A Carpenter
  • Angela Cochran
  • Lettie Y. Conrad
  • David Crotty
  • Joseph Esposito
  • Roohi Ghosh
  • Robert Harington
  • Haseeb Irfanullah
  • Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
  • Phill Jones
  • Roy Kaufman
  • Scholarly Kitchen
  • Stephanie Lovegrove Hansen
  • Alice Meadows
  • Alison Mudditt
  • Jill O'Neill
  • Charlie Rapple
  • Dianndra Roberts
  • Maryam Sayab
  • Roger C. Schonfeld
  • Avi Staiman
  • Randy Townsend
  • Tim Vines
  • Hong Zhou

Interested in writing for The Scholarly Kitchen? Learn more.

Most Recent

  • Designed for Someone Else’s Life: Balancing Academic Careers with Caregiving Responsibilities
  • Guest Post — Why Science Communication Must be the Next Competitive Edge for Scholarly Publishers
  • Back to the (Article of the) Future: An interview with Sami Benchekroun and Rod Cookson

SSP News

The SSP Mentorship Program is Open – Apply Today

Feb 3, 2026

Next “Pulse Check” Poll to Capture Perspectives about the Economic Outlook for Scholarly Communications in 2026

Feb 2, 2026

Your Voice Matters—Take part in our 2026 Membership Survey!

Jan 28, 2026
Follow the Scholarly Kitchen Blog Follow Us

Related Articles:

  • Decorative graphical depiction of a group of people wearing bright colors and standing in a formation that appears to be a human profile. Guest Post – Beyond Open Access, Part II: Make Images Truly Accessible for All
  • Colourful overlapping silhouettes of Professional or Business people. Guest Post — How Changes to ADA Title II Impact Libraries, and What We Can Do to Respond, Part 2
  • European flag with "European Accessibility Act" written on top of it Guest Post — Well-meant Is Not Well-done:  A Reply to “European Accessibility Act: Navigating the Challenges of EAA Compliance”

Next Article:

Robot hand and saving coins in glass jar. Artificial intelligence. Vector illustration Guest Post — AI Isn’t Going to Pay for Content … Part Two: The Path Forward
Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The mission of the Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP) is to advance scholarly publishing and communication, and the professional development of its members through education, collaboration, and networking. SSP established The Scholarly Kitchen blog in February 2008 to keep SSP members and interested parties aware of new developments in publishing.

The Scholarly Kitchen is a moderated and independent blog. Opinions on The Scholarly Kitchen are those of the authors. They are not necessarily those held by the Society for Scholarly Publishing nor by their respective employers.

  • About
  • Archives
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Website Credits
ISSN 2690-8085